中国舞蹈史学著作能否称之为“信史”——对业界外某些学者相关质疑的回应

Whether Chinese Dance History Works Can Be Called “True History”:Response to the Related Queries From Scholars Outside Dance Research Field

本文针对非舞蹈学界学者指出的舞蹈研究缺乏自己的方法论和中国舞蹈史学著作是否是"信史"的质疑,进行了友善回应和具有说服力的学术论证,最终证明中国舞蹈史学著作是"信史",舞蹈研究亦有自己的方法论。

This article is to propose a friendly answer and convincing argument to the queries from scholars outside dance research field, that dance research lacks its own methodology and whether the dance works of Chinese dance history is ＂true history＂. According to the argument, the works of Chinese dance history are proved to be ＂true history＂, and the dance research is also proved to have its own methodology.