摘要
《气候变化正义》一书使用了传统的福利经济学分析框架,但他们同时也对使用非经济学的分析视角来,非经济学分析视角弱化了他们的研究结论。尽管他们正确地意识到了过高的伦理要求会使得限制温室气体的国际协议受到阻碍,但是他们的分析使得气候变化正义在气候变化政策上显得过于无足轻重。
The book Climate Change Justice adopts the framework of conventional welfare economics, they show a willingness to engage with noneconomic perspectives, which softens their conclusions. Although they are right to see a risk that overly aggressive ethical claims could derail international agreement on restricting green-house gases, their analysis makes climate justice too marginal to climate policy.
出处
《鄱阳湖学刊》
2014年第3期115-128,共14页
Journal of Poyang Lake
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"碳金融市场的国家干预法律机制研究"(13CFX097)的阶段性成果
