期刊文献+

美国田纳西州高等教育绩效评估体系的历史演变及启示 被引量:8

Historical Evolution of Evaluation Standards of Higher Education Performance Funding in the State of Tennessee
原文传递
导出
摘要 绩效拨款制度是促进欧美公立高等教育质量提升的重要政策,美国田纳西州高等教育绩效评估制度创立于1979年,目前已进入第8个评估周期。本文对其8个周期的绩效评估体系进行研究,分析其历史演变和体系特点,认为该评估体系是人才培养的达标性和发展性评估,其核心构架由教育质量评价指标、教育质量提升措施和满意度三个部分组成,具有简明扼要、量化可行、指标动态发展等特点,该体系对我国高等教育绩效评估工作的发展具有一定借鉴作用。 In Europe and the United States, performance funding policies have become an important instrument for improving the quality of public higher education. The state of Tennessee implemented the Tennessee Performance Funding Policy in 1979, and it has remained in effect for eight periods until now. This paper researches its historical evolution and examines the characteristics of the performance evaluation standards. The evaluation standards are accreditable and improvable, with a core system composed of evaluation indictors of education quality, education quality improvement, and satisfaction. The evaluation standards are concise, numerical, feasible, and dynamically developing, which have im- plications for performance evaluation of high education in China.
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期81-86,共6页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金 2013年国务院学位委员会办公室委托课题"高等学校研究生教育绩效拨款研究" 中国学位与研究生教育学会2013年面上课题"学术学位研究生教育改革与制度创新研究"(B2-2013Y03-017)
关键词 绩效评估 田纳西州 历史演变 performance evaluatiom the state of Tennessee historical evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Joseph C. Burke, Funding Public Colleges and Universities for Performance: Popularity, Problems, and Prospects (New York: Rockefeller Institute Press, 2002).
  • 2Trudy W. Banta, Linch B. Rudolph, Janice Van Dyke, Home S. Fisher , "Performance Funding Comes of Age in Ten- nessee,"The Journal of Higher Education 1 (1996) : 23 - 45.
  • 3E. Grady Bogue, W. Brown, "Performance Incentives for State Colleges,"Harvard Business Review 60, 6(1982) : 123 - 128.
  • 4E. Grady Bogue, Betty Dandridge Johnson, "Performance Incentives and Public College Accountability in the United States: A Quarter Century Policy Audit,'Higher Education Management and Policy 22,2 (2010) : 1 - 22.
  • 5Performance Funding: Performance Funding 2010- 2015 Cycle Guidebook, Performance Funding 1978 - 1982 Standards (pilot cycles), Cycle 1 : Performance Funding 1982 - 1987 Standards, Cycle 2: Performance Funding 1987 - 1992 Standards, Cycle 3: Performance Funding 1992 - 1997 Standards, Cycle 4: Performance Funding 1997 - 2000 Standards, Cycle 5 : Performance Funding 2000 - 2005 Standards, Cycle 6: Performance Funding 2005 - 2010 Standards. http://www, state, tn. us/thec/Divisions/AcademicAffairs/aa_main, html, 2014- 3 - 12.
  • 6Performance Funding: Education Commission of the States, "The Progress of Education Reform, "http://www. ecs. org/html/educationlssues/ProgressofReform, asp,2014 - 3 - 12.
  • 7Perforrnance Funding Recommendations, http://www, state, tn. us/thec/Divisions/AcademicAffairs/performance_ funding/Copy_of_THEC PF Recommendations_by_Cycle. pdf. 2014 - 3 - 12.
  • 8Performance Funding 2010 - 2015 Cycle Guidebook, http://www, state, tn. us/thec/Divisions/AcademicAffairs/aa_ main. html, 2014 - 03 - 12.
  • 9Ronald Charles Williams, High Education Stakeholders' Perceptions of Termessee's Current Performance Funding Pol- icy (A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Education, Tennessee State University, 2005).
  • 10E. Grady Bogue, Betty Dandridge Johnson, "Performance Incentives and Public College Accountability in the United States: A Quarter Century Policy Audit,"Higher Education Management and Policy 22,2 (2010), 1 - 22.

同被引文献41

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部