3Anderson, R C. & D. A. Ausubel (eds. ). 1965. Readingsin the Psychology of Cognition [C]. New York: Holt,Rinehart &- Winstoa.
4Bitchener,J. &- U. Knoch 2009. The contribution of writtencorrective feedback to language development : A tenmonth investigation [J], Applied Linguistics 31 (2):193-214.
5Brown, H. D. 1987. Principles of Language Learning andTeaching (2nd edn) [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. : Pren-tice Hall Regents.
6Cumming, A. 1998. Issues and prospects: Introduction tothe 50th jubilee special issue [J], Language Learning 48(4): 453-63.
7Krashen> S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Lan-guage Acquisition [M]. New York: LongmaaKrashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis : Issties and Impli-cations [M], London: Longman.
8Selinker, L. 1992. Rediscovering Interlanguage [M], London,New York: Longman.
9Sheen, Y. 2010. The role of oral and written corrective feed-back in SLA [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisi-tion 32 (2): 169-79.
10Truscott,J. 1996. The case against grammar correction inL2 writing classes [J]. Language Learning 46 (2):327-69.
