期刊文献+

后卡扎菲时代的利比亚国家安全治理 被引量:3

Libyan Security Governance in the Post-Gaddafi Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统上,冲突后的安全治理模式主要有三种:安全部门改革(SSR),解除武装、复员和重返社会(DDR),临时稳定措施(ISM)。卡扎菲政权被推翻后,利比亚安全重建进展缓慢,目前已经陷入了游击队和武装组织失控、安全机制失范和地区安全结构失衡的困境。利比亚战争对后冲突时代的国家重建影响巨大,是造成当前利比亚"三失"状况的重要原因。解决利比亚安全困境必须将上述三种模式结合起来,集各方之力,制定出宏观的、长期的利比亚安全治理路线图,根据不同的情况逐步解除游击队的武装,加强安全部门的制度建设,加快建立协调机构,与利比亚重建相关的重要外部行为体应发挥建设性作用,高度重视利比亚动荡的外溢效应,共同推进利比亚的安全治理向良性发展的趋势演变。在利比亚冲突和重建中,中国既坚持了传统的不干涉内政原则,又根据具体情况灵活适度地介入,其中东外交正在发生令人瞩目的变化。 Traditionally, there are three security governance models in post-conflict reconstruction: disarmament, demobilization and reintegration(DDR), security sector reform(SSR) and temporary stabilization measures(ISM). After Muammar Gaddafi's regime was overthrown, Libya's security reconstruction was rather slow. The guerrillas and armed groups are out of control, the security regimes are out of service and the regional security structures are now in imbalance. Libya's war has tremendous impacts on the country's post-conflict reconstruction, which is also the important reason of the current grim status of Libyan security. The solutions to the dilemma lies in the combination of the traditional ways, developing a comprehensive management strategy and roadmap, taking targeted measures to disarm the guerrillas under different circumstances, strengthening the construction of the security sector, and accelerating the establishment of the coordinating organization. And all the related actors should play a constructive role and attach great importance to the spillover effects of the Libyan unrest to promote security governance in Libya towards irreversible trend. During the process of Libya's conflict and reconstruction, China has not only adhered to the traditional principle of non-interference, but also involved creatively which implies remarkable changes of its Middle East diplomacy.
作者 江涛
出处 《国际展望》 CSSCI 2014年第3期88-106,157,共19页 Global Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献131

  • 1秦亚青.观念调整与大国合作[J].现代国际关系,2002(3):6-8. 被引量:5
  • 2余潇枫.安全哲学新理念:“优态共存”[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(2):5-12. 被引量:39
  • 3余潇枫,王江丽.非传统安全维护的“边界”、“语境”与“范式”[J].世界经济与政治,2006(11):55-61. 被引量:35
  • 4[美]詹姆斯·罗西瑙著,张胜军,刘小林等译.《没有政府的治理:世界政治中的秩序与变革》,南昌:江西人民出版社,2001年版,第5页.
  • 5Commission of Global Governance,Our Global Neighbourhood, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995,pp. 2-3.
  • 6Elke Krahmann, "Conceptualizing Security Governance," Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 38, No. 1,2003,pp. 5-26.
  • 7Mark Webber, et al., "The Governance of European Security," Review of International Studies, Vol. 30,No.1, 2004,pp. 3-26.
  • 8Emil Kirchner, "The Challenge of European Union Security Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2006, pp. 947-968.
  • 9Heiner Httnggi, "Making Sense of Security Sector Governance," in H. Hanggi, and T. Winkler, eds. ,Challenges of Security Sector Governance,LIT: Munster, 2003, pp. 3-22.
  • 10Andrea Oelsner, "Consensus and Govemance in Mercosur: The Evolution of the South American Security Agenda," Security Dialogue, Vol. 40, No. 2,2009, pp. 191-212.

共引文献75

同被引文献139

  • 1李韡.美国宣告利比亚核武器与导弹开发计划已“解体”[J].国外核新闻,2004(3):12-12. 被引量:1
  • 2刘军.理性主义国际关系理论的困境与建构主义的挑战——以冷战后的北约东扩为例[J].国际观察,2007(2):60-66. 被引量:3
  • 3Paul Cornish,“Gun Control”,The World Today,Vol.64,No.10,October 2008,p.30.
  • 4Wyn Q.Bowen,Libya and Nuclear Proliferation:Stepping Back from the Brink,Routledge,2010.
  • 5Nathan E.Busch and Joseph F.Pila,t"Disarming Libya?A Reassessment after the Arab Spring",International Affairs,Vol.89,Issue 2,2003,pp.451-475.
  • 6Gawdat Bahga,t"Nonproliferation Success:The Libyan Model",World Affairs,Vol.168,No.1,Summer 2005,pp.3-12.
  • 7John Prados,"How Qaddafi Came Clean",Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,November/December 2008,pp.26-33.
  • 8Jonathan B.Tucker,"The Rollback of Libya's Chemical Weapons",The Nonproliferation Review,Vol.16,No.3,November 2009,pp.363-384.
  • 9Peter Viggo Jakobsen,"Reinterpreting Libya's WMD Turnaround:Bridging the Carrot-Coercion Divide",Journal of Strategic Studies,Vol.35,No.4,2012,pp.489-512.
  • 10Bruce W.Jentleson and Christopher A.Whytock,"Who'Won'Libya?The Force-Diplomacy Debate and Its Implications for Theory and Policy",International Security,Vol.30,No.3,Winter 2005/2006,pp.47-86.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部