期刊文献+

高管团队能力与企业绩效间关系的实证分析——考虑CEO社会资本的调节作用 被引量:3

Empirical Analysis on Relationship between Ability of TMT and Enterprise Performance:Considering Regulatory Effect of CEO′s Guanxi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对高管团队人口统计学特征指标和企业绩效指标进行因子分析的基础上,结合高层梯队理论和代理理论,研究了高管团队不同层次的属性(自然属性、能力属性和治理属性)与企业不同层次的绩效(成长绩效、增长绩效和经营绩效)的关系,并进一步分析了CEO的社会资本在两者关系中所起的调节作用。研究结论如下:中国上市公司的绩效与高管团队的管理素质有关;CEO的社会资本削弱了高管团队的管理素质与企业绩效的正向关系;中国现实环境中存在的"关系"不利于中国企业整体的成长。提出:完善市场经济体制、加强法制建设、厘清政府与市场的关系对于企业健康成长具有重要意义。 On the basis of the factor analysis on the indicators of demographic characteristics of top management team(TMT)and corporation performance, this paper studies the relationship between different levels of attributes of TMT(natural attribute, ability attribute and governance attribute) and different levels of corporation performance(long growth performance,short growth performance and operating performance) ,and further examines the regulatory effect of CEO's social capital on these relationships. The result shows as follows:there is a relationship between corporation performance and management quality of TMT, and CEO's social capital weaken this positive relationship;Guanxi existing in China is harmful for the growth of China's enterprises. Finally,it suggests that it is very meaningful for the growth of China's enterprises to improve market economic system,and strengthen the construction of legal system, and clarify the relationship between government and market.
出处 《技术经济》 CSSCI 2014年第6期117-123,共7页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 上海财经大学创新基金项目(cxjj-2011-380)
关键词 高管团队 企业绩效 社会资本 高层梯队 top management team; corporate performance; social capital; upper echelon
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1斯科特·斯特莱登.强关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:12-14.
  • 2CARPENTER M A,SANDERS W G. Upper echelons research revisited : antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition[J]. Journal of Management, 2004,30(6): 749-778.
  • 3JENSEN M, ZAJAC E. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: how demographic preferences and structural differences shape the scope of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004,25 (6) : 507-524.
  • 4HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper echelons: the or- ganization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(2) : 193-206.
  • 5PFEFFER J. Organizational demography[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1983,5 (2) : 299-357.
  • 6FINKELSTEIN S, HAMBRICK D C. Strategic Leader- ship:Top Executives and their Effects On Organizations [M]. West Publishing Company, 1996 : 123-134.
  • 7TIHANYI L, ELLSTRAND A E, DAILY C M, et al Composition of the top management team and firm inter national diversification[J]. Journal of Management,2000 26(6) : 1157-11772.
  • 8WIERSEMA M F, BIRD A. Organizational demography in Japanese firms:group heterogeneity individual dissimilarity and top management team turnover[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993,36(5) :996-1025.
  • 9DAIRY C M,JOHNSON J L,DALTON R. On the meas- urement of board composition:poor consistency and a serious mismatch of theory and operationalization[J]. Decision Science,1999,30(1) :83-106.
  • 10彭罗斯.企业成长理论[M].赵晓,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2007:1-9.

二级参考文献40

  • 1石军伟,胡立君.企业社会资本的自愿供给:一个静态博弈模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,22(8):16-24. 被引量:10
  • 2C.J,巴纳德:《经理人员的职能》,中国社会出版社,1997年版.
  • 3尼古莱.福斯:《面向企业能力理论》,东北财经大学出版社,1998年版.
  • 4安妮布鲁金:《智力资本及其管理》,东北财经出版社,1999年版.
  • 5迪屈奇:《交易成本经济学》,经济科学出版社,1994年版.
  • 6安德鲁.坎贝尔:《战略协同》,机械工业出版社,2000年版.
  • 7彼得.圣吉:《第五项修炼》,上海三联出版社,1994年版.
  • 8比尔.盖茨:《未来时速》,北京大学出版社,1999年版.
  • 9赫塞尔本等:《未来的领导》,四川人民出版社,1998年版.
  • 10约翰.科特:《总经理》,华夏出版社,1997年版.

共引文献282

同被引文献50

  • 1清华大学.全球创业观察报告(2002-2012)[M].北京:清华大学出版社.
  • 2POLITIS D. The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,29 (4) : 399-424.
  • 3MAN T W Y, LAU T. Entrepreneurial competencies of SME owner/managers in the Hong Kong services sector: a qualitative analysis[J]. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2000,8(3) : 235-254.
  • 4COPE J. Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entre- preneurship [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,29 (4) . 373-397.
  • 5STARR J A,BYGRAVE W D. The assets and liabilities of prior start-up experience:an exploratory study of mul- tiple venture entrepreneurs[M]//CHURCHILL N C, BYGRAVE W D, COVIN J G, et al. Frontiers of entre- preneurship research, Wellesley: BaBson College, 1991: 213-227.
  • 6MACMILLAN I C. To really learn about entrepreneurship, let's study habitual entrepreneurs [ Z]. Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Snider Entre- preneurial Center, 1986.
  • 7THOMAS W Y M,THERESA L,CHAN K F. The com- petitiveness of small and medium enterprises:a conceptu- alization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002,17(2) 123 -142.
  • 8COPE J. Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entre- preneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2005,29(4) : 373-397.
  • 9PETKOVA A P. A theory of entrepreneurial learning from performance errors[J]. International Entrepreneur- ship and Martagement Journal,2009,5(4):345-367.
  • 10HOLMAN D, PAVLICA K, THORPE R. Rethinking Kolb's theory of experiential learning in management ed- ucation the contribution of social constructionism and ac- tivity theory[J]. Management Learning, 1997, 28(2): 135-148.

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部