摘要
目的 对比拉米夫定与恩替卡韦预防B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(B-NHL)合并慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的患者接受利妥昔单抗联合化疗期间出现HBV再激活的疗效及化疗后乙型病毒肝炎发生的危险因素.方法 回顾性分析109例HBV感染的B-NHL患者在接受利妥昔单抗联合化疗后HBV再激活的发生率、肝损伤发生率及病死率.其中79例接受拉米夫定治疗,30例接受恩替卡韦治疗;所有患者在化疗开始前1周开始接受拉米夫定或恩替卡韦治疗,疗程至化疗结束后6个月.结果 拉米夫定组及恩替卡韦组HBV再激活率分别为31.6%、10.0%;肝功能损伤发生率分别为27.8%、6. 7%;HBV相关肝炎发生率分别为24.1%、3. 3%;化疗中断发生率分别为22.8%、3. 3%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);两组患者的病死率分别为2. 5%、0,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).化疗过程中,出现HBV再激活的患者,多数为Ⅲ ~Ⅳ期的B-NHL患者.结论 恩替卡韦相较于拉米夫定在预防治疗B-NHL化疗期间HBV激活上,具有更好的疗效;特别是对于分期较晚的B-NHL患者,恩替卡韦可作为首选药物.
Objective This study was designed to compare the efficacy of lamivudine and entecavir in preventing hepatitis B reactivation in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) patients undergoing rituximab-based treatment.Methods A retrospective study of the prevalence and mortality of HBV reactivation and the rates of hepatitis in 109 cases of patients with HBV virus and B-NHL undergoing rituximab-based chemotherapy treatment was taken,A total of 79 patients received lamivudine and 30 patients received entecavir.These patients received either lamivudine or entecavir during chemotherapy and for 6 months after completion of chemotherapy.Results The rates of hepatitis B reactivation in the lamivudine group or entecavir group were 31.6% and 10.0%; the occurrence rates of liver function damage were 27.8% and 6.7%,the rates of HBV-related hepatitis were 24.1% and 3.3%;and the disruption of chemotherapy were 22.8% and 3.3%,respectively,with statistical significance (P<0.05).There were no significant difference in mortality (2.5% vs 0).Most of all patients with hepatitis B reactivation had B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ).Conclusion In B-NHL patients under rituximab combination chemotherapy treatment,entecavir is more effective than lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B reactivation.For patients with advanced stage disease,entecavir should be considered the primary preventive therapy.
出处
《浙江医学》
CAS
2014年第11期941-944,共4页
Zhejiang Medical Journal