期刊文献+

LEEP术后切缘阳性的高级别CIN绝经前患者病灶残留相关因素研究 被引量:3

Risk factors of residual lesions in premenopausal patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of positive margins after LEEP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨LEEP术后切缘阳性的高级别子宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)绝经前患者病灶残留的相关因素,为进一步诊疗提供依据。方法收集初次LEEP术切缘阳性并行二次手术的51例高级别CIN、绝经前患者的临床资料,并对其病灶残留及相关因素进行分析。结果二次手术患者术后病理提示CIN共19例,其病灶残留率为37.2%。年龄≤35岁者病灶残留率为17.6%,年龄>35岁为47.1%,两者之间差异明显(P<0.05)。术前子宫颈脱落细胞(LBC)检测提示高度上皮内病变的病灶残留率明显高于低度上皮内病变组(P<0.05)。颈管搔刮物中提示病变存在者病灶残余率约72.7%,高于颈管搔刮物阴性者(P=0 006)。多因素logistic回归分析发现,LBC提示高度上皮内病变及颈管搔刮物阳性是与初次锥切切缘阳性病灶残留高度相关因素,其危险度分别为3.258、7.064。对51例二次手术患者随访至2013年6月,共2例复发,占3.92%。结论患者年龄、LBC结果及颈管搔刮物阳性与初次手术病灶残留有相关性,对于此类患者应予以高度重视。 Objective To investigate the risk factors of residual lesions in patients with high- grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of positive resection margins after loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP). Methods The clinical data of 51 premenopausal patients with high- grade CIN undergoing LEEP from January 2007 to June 2012 at Affiliated Shaoxing Hospi-tal were retrospectively analyzed. Al patients had positive resection margins in initial conization and underwent second surgery. The risk factors of residual lesions were analyzed. Results Histopathological results of the second operation showed that 19 cases out 51 patients (37.2%) had residual disease. The residual disease rate in patients aged≤35 year was 17.6% , while in those〉35y was 47.1%(P35 years, LBC showing ASC- H and HSIL and endocervical curettage suggesting CIN are risk factors associat-ed with residual lesions in patients with high- grade CIN of positive margins after LEEP.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2014年第12期1056-1059,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 子宫颈上皮内瘤变 子宫颈线圈电切术 切缘阳性 Cervical cancer LEEP Positive margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1卢红鲜,陈亚侠,倪娟,万小云,吕卫国,谢幸.子宫颈锥切术切缘阳性的相关因素分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2009,44(3):200-203. 被引量:29
  • 2Leguevaque P, Motton S, Decharme A, et at. Predictors of recur- rence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2010,36(11):1073-1079.
  • 3Wright T J, Massad L S, Dunton C J, et al. 2006 consensus guide- lines for the management of 'women with cervical intraepffhelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007,197(4):340-345.
  • 4Massad L S, Einstein M H, Huh W K, et aL2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors[J], Obstet Gynecol, 2013,121 (4):829-846.
  • 5Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya G F. et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009,101(10): 721-728.
  • 6Moore B C, Higgins R V, Laurent S L, et al. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 173(2): 361-368,.
  • 7Mohamed-Noor K, Quinn M A, Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnor- mal epithelium: a review of 699 cases[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1997, 67(1 ): 34-38.
  • 8Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8(11): 985-993.
  • 9Lee S J, Kim W Y, Lee J W, et al.Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gy- necology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix[J].lnt J Gynecol Cancer,2009,19(3): 407-411.

二级参考文献18

  • 1戴志琴,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.宫颈上皮内瘤变手术后边缘的评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(2):153-154. 被引量:10
  • 2Kyrgiou M, Tsoumpou I, Vrekoussis T, et al. The up-to-date evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the Cochrane calposcopy & cervical cytopathology collaborative group ( C5 group ) approach. Cancer Treat Rev .2006.32,516-523.
  • 3Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton C J, et al. 2006 consensus uidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197:340-345.
  • 4Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic carcinomas. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2000,70:209-262.
  • 5Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure : a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol, 2007, 8 : 985-993.
  • 6薛风霞.宫颈炎症//乐杰.妇产科学.6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:264-267.
  • 7Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet ,2006,367:489-498.
  • 8Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, et al. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm biah. BJOG ,2007 ,114 :70-80.
  • 9Soutter WP, Sasieni P, Panoskaltsis T. Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer,2006,118:2048-2055.
  • 10Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E, et al. Risk of cervical and other cancers after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ,2005,331 : 1183-1185.

共引文献28

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部