期刊文献+

公允价值选择影响因素综述 被引量:2

Literature Review on Factors Influencing Fair Value Option
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从公允价值选择的发展过程看,"三大假说"是解释公允价值选择的理论基础,而"机会主义观"和"效率观"是公允价值选择的理论发展。文章从实证会计理论基础——"三大假说""效率观"和"机会主义观"出发,对国内外关于公允价值选择影响因素的相关研究进行述评。从文献回顾的过程中,可以看出,"三大假说"是"机会主义观"的具体体现,"机会主义观"和"效率观"共同影响着公允价值的选择,并且企业业绩、管理层薪酬、债务合同、企业规模、信息不对称、信息质量和估值成本等都是影响企业选择公允价值的因素。最后,结合当前国内外的研究现状,对公允价值未来研究方向提出一些展望。 Seen from the developing process of fair value option, "three hypotheses" is the theoretical basis for the interpretation of fair value option, while both opportunism view and efficiency view are the results of theory development in fair value option. This article mainly reviews the related research on factors influencing fair value option based on empirical accounting theory--"three hypothesis", "opportunism view" and "efficiency view". From the literature review, it can be concluded that opportunism is the concrete manifestation of "three hypotheses" and influences fair value option in conjunction with efficiency view. Furthermore, it concludes that corporate performance, executive compensation, debt contracts, company scale, information asymmetry, information quality and valuation cost are the factors that influence fair value option. Finally, the prospects are put forward for future research based on the status of foreign and domestic research.
出处 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期73-80,共8页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL020) 北京市长城学者计划项目(CIT&TCD20130308) 中华女子学院青年课题项目"公允价值在资产证券化风险管理中的应用"(kg9-04006)
关键词 公允价值选择 三大假说 机会主义观 效率观 fair value option three hypothesis opportunism view efficiency view
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1李端生,朱力.论现代企业会计政策的选择[J].会计研究,1996(8):41-43. 被引量:30
  • 2张为国,徐宗宇.实证研究·会计选择·证券市场[J].会计研究,1997(10):5-13. 被引量:31
  • 3Watts R L, Zimmerman J L. Towards a positive the- ory of the determination of accounting standards [ J ]. Ac- counting Review, 1978(2) :112 - 134.
  • 4Watts R L, Zimmerman J L. Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective [ J ]. Accounting Review,1990,65(1) : 131 -156.
  • 5Hodder L D, Hopkins P E, Wahlen J M. Risk-rele- vance of fair-value income measures for commercial banks [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 2006, 81 (2) : 337 - 375.
  • 6Barth M E. Fair value accounting : evidence from in- vestment securities and the market valuation of banks[ J]. Ac- counting Review, 1994,69 ( 1 ) : 1 - 25.
  • 7Aboody D, Kasznik R. CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000, 29 ( 1 ) : 73 - 100.
  • 8Carroll T J, Linsmeier T J, Petroni K R. The relia- bility of fair value versus historical cost information: evidence from closed-end mutual funds [ J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2003, 18(1): 1-24.
  • 9Eccher E A, Ramesh K, Thiagarajan S R. Fair val- ue disclosures by bank holding companies [ J ]. Journal of Ac- counting and Economics, 1996, 22 ( 1 ) : 79 - 117.
  • 10邓传洲.公允价值的价值相关性:B股公司的证据[J].会计研究,2005(10):55-62. 被引量:96

二级参考文献188

共引文献3506

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部