期刊文献+

协商式民意调查的国际案例借鉴 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 协商式民意调查通过随机抽样的方式选取参与者进行对话,以实现平等与协商的均衡,有利于把原始的民意转化为知情的民意。协商式民意调查的目的不仅仅是简单地预测民意,而是更多地为公众提供一个讨论的场所,在信息充分和审慎思考的环境下,探究呈现真正知情的民意,进而实现协商民主的本义,这对我国推进协商民主广泛多层制度化发展具有借鉴意义。
作者 马奔 李婷
机构地区 山东大学
出处 《国家行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期117-122,共6页 Journal of China National School of Administration
基金 教育部人文社科基金"我国协商民主制度创新与建构研究"(13YJC810012) 国家社科基金"健全社会主义协商民主制度"(13&ZD033)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Vincent Price. Public Opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
  • 2Jurgen Habermas. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere : An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MITPress, 1989.
  • 3James S. Fishkin. The Nutiou in a Room: Turning Public Opinion into Policy. Boston Review, March/April2006. https: //www. bostonreview, net/ james - fishkin - cation - in - a - room - turning - public - opinion - into - policy.
  • 4Mansbridge J. Deliberative Polling as the Gold Standard. The Good So- ciety, 2010, Vol. 19, Nol, pp55 -62.
  • 5Center for Deliberative Democracy. Deliberative Polling: Executive Summary. http: //odd. stanford, edu/polls/docs/flyers/deliberative - pol- ling - flyer - en. pdf.
  • 6Center for Deliberative Democracy. Deliberative Polling: Timeline. ht- tp: //cdd. stanford, edu/polls/docs/flyers/DP -timeline. pdf.
  • 7Deliberative Polling in Macao. http: //cdd. stanford, edu/polls/ma- cao/2012/dp - macao - graphic,jPg.
  • 8Center for Deliberative Democracy. What' s Next California? A Califor- nia Stare'side DELIBERATIVE POLL for California' s Future. http: // cdd. stanford, edu/polls/califoruia/2011/final/nextca -final -report. pdf.
  • 9Shanto Iyengar, Robert C. Luskin, James S. Fishkin. Facilitating In- formed Public Opinion: Evidence from Face -to -Face and Online Delibera- tive Polls//Almual Meeting of the American Pohtical Science Association, Philadelphia, PA. 2003.
  • 10Bruce Ackerman, James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. Public Opin- ion Quarterly. 2004, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp641 -650.

同被引文献12

  • 1中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.com/2014-10/28/c1113015330.htm.2014-11-11.
  • 2M. Saward. Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Rep- resentation and Association[M]//Fishkin, J. and Luskin, R.The Quest for Deliberative Democracy. London: Routledge,2000.
  • 3中共桥头镇委员会.关于推进基层协商民主机制建设的实施意见[EB/0L].慈溪市桥头镇人民政府网.2014-05-29.
  • 4Tom Wakeford.Citizens Juries: a Radical Alternative for Social Research[J].Social Research Update, 2002( 2 ).
  • 5Luskin, R. Fishkin, J. and Jowell. R.Considered opin- ions: deliberative polling in Britain[J]. British Journal of Politi- cal Science, 2002(3).
  • 6M.P. D'Entre'ves. Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives[M]//Festenstein, M.Deliberation, Citizenship and Identity.Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
  • 7Components of a Citizens Jury, Jefferson Center net, available at[EB/OL], http://jefferson-center.org/what-we-do/cit- izen-jmies/components-of-a-citizens-jury/.
  • 8冯慧.美国的协商性立法[N].人民法院报,2005-11-14.
  • 9张力.走向共识:美国协商行政立法的兴起与发展[J].行政法学研究,2012(4):115-121. 被引量:14
  • 10王劲晓.从美国大陪审团制度探究我国人民监督员制度的完善[J].河南社会科学,2013,21(10):103-104. 被引量:6

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部