期刊文献+

X线蒙特卡洛算法与有限元笔形束算法在旋转容积调强放疗计划中的剂量学比较 被引量:1

Dosimetric comparison of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo and finite size pencil beam dose calculation algorithm for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较Monaco治疗计划系统X线蒙特卡洛算法(X-ray voxel Monte Carlo,XVMC)和有限元笔形束算法(finite size pencil beam,FSPB)在食管癌和直肠癌旋转容积调强放疗计划中的剂量学差异。方法:选取7例食管癌和7例直肠癌旋转容积调强放疗计划,分别使用XVMC算法和FSPB算法进行剂量计算,比较靶区和危及器官的剂量分布差异。结果:XVMC算法的剂量计算值均高于FSPB算法,在食管癌的靶区和脊髓、直肠癌的靶区和危及器官,各项指标差值都小于3%,肺的各项指标差值最大达到10%。结论:在临床旋转容积调强治疗中,尤其是计算区域含有低密度组织较多的病例,优先推荐更为精确的XVMC算法进行剂量计算。 Objective To compare the dosimetric differences between finite size pencil beam (FSPB) and X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) in Monaco treatment planning system for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning of esophageal cancer and rectal cancer. Methods For 7 esophageal cancer patients and 7 rectal cancer patients, VMAT treatment plans with FSPB and XVMC were preformed respectively. The differences of dose distribution to targets and organs at risk (OAR) were determined. Results The dose calculated by XVMC was higher than that by FSPB. For targets and spinal cord of esophageal cancer, targets and organs at risk of rectal cancer, the differences between XVMC and FSPB were less than 3%, and maximum difference to the lung reached 10%. Conclusion In clinical VMAT treatment, especially for the cases with calculation area including many low density tissues, XVMC algorithm gains the priority of dose calculation for its accuracy.
作者 王宁 陈阿龙
出处 《医疗卫生装备》 CAS 2014年第6期76-78,85,共4页 Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
关键词 有限元笔形束 X线蒙特卡洛 旋转容积调强治疗 食管癌 直肠癌 finite size pencil beam X-ray voxel Monte Carlo volumetric modulated arc therapy esophageal cancer rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Yu C X. Intensity-modulated therapy with dynamic multileaf colli- mation :alternative to tomotherapy[]]. Phys Med Biol, 1995,40 : 1 435- 1 449.
  • 2Yu C X,Tang G. Intensity-modulated arc therapy: principles,tech- nologies and clinical implementation[J]. Phys Med Biol,2011,56: 31-54.
  • 3Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy :IMRT in a single gantry arc[J]. Med Phys, 2008,35 : 310-317.
  • 4Palma D, Vollans E ,James K ,et 01. Volumetric modulated are thera- py for delivery of prostate radiotherapy : comparison with intensity- modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiother- apy[J]. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 2008,72 : 996-1 001.
  • 5International commission on radiation units & measurements. Pho- ton ,electron ,proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues. I- CRU Report 46[R]. Bethesda:ICRU, 1992.
  • 6Jelen U,Sohn M,Alber M. A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2005,50 : 1 747-1 766.
  • 7Jelen U, Alber M. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections[J]. Phys Med Bio1,2007,52:617- 633.
  • 8李国丽,周金斌,林辉,景佳,吴爱东.基于Monte Carlo模拟的快速有限笔束算法研究[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2009,39(5):515-519. 被引量:3
  • 9Carrasco P, Jornet N, Duch M A,et ol. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phan-toms with lung equivalent heterogeneitiesunder conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium[J]. Med Phys,2004, 31:2 899-2 911.
  • 10Krieger T, Sauer O A. Monte Carlo- versus peneil-beam-/collapsed- cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom [J]. Phys Med Biol, 2005,50 : 859-868.

二级参考文献8

  • 1AhnesjO A, Aspradakis M M. Topical review: dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy [J]. Physics in Medicine Biology, 1999, 44(11): R99-R155.
  • 2Bourland J D, Chaney E L. A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions [J]. Medical Physics, 1992, 19(6): 1 401-1 412.
  • 3Jelen U, S hn M, Alber M. A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization[J]. Physics in Medicine Biology, 2005, 50(8): 1 747-1 766.
  • 4Lin H, Wu Y, Chen Y X. A finite size pencil beam for IMRT dose optimization': a simpler analytical function for the finite size pencil beam kernel [J]. Physics in Medicine Biology, 2006, 51(6): L13-L15.
  • 5van Dyk J, Barnett R B, Cygler J E, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics,1993, 26(2) : 261-273.
  • 6Venselaar J, Welleweerd H. Application of a test package in an intercomparison of the performance of treatment planning systems used in a clinical setting [J]. Radiotherapy Oncology, 2001, 60(2): 203-213.
  • 7Venselaar J, Welleweerd H, Mijnheer B. Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems[J]. Radiotherapy Oncology, 2001, 60(2): 191-201.
  • 8翁学军,罗立民,汪家旺.基于Monte Carlo模拟法快速计算电子束放射治疗的剂量分布[J].电子学报,2002,30(3):454-456. 被引量:3

共引文献2

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部