摘要
社区矫正风险评估因素结构直接影响评估结果。通过分析中外30个评估问卷,构建评估因素关系模型,探究中外风险评估因素差异。评估问卷在犯罪人基本情况、家庭居住情况和精神心理状况三个维度上,中国大陆和港台地区与外国的评估因素数目存在显著差异;在犯罪人基本情况和犯罪情况两个维度上,社区矫正人员与罪犯存在显著差异;在其它维度上未见显著差异。我国评估因素选取需科学选取和理性设计,并进行动态评估。
Assessment result is correct or not directly determined by the risk factors of com- munity correction. It selected 30 risk assessment questionnaires in China and foreign countries, using SPSS17.0 and SNA, comparative analyzed the differences in risk assessment factors at home and abroad. The study found that there is covariation among the six dimensions. There was a sig- nificant difference between Chinese mainland and Hong Kong and Taiwan regions and foreign countries, in regard to three dimensions: the criminal basic situation, family living conditions and psychological status. And there was a significant difference between the scores of the correctional officers and criminals in regard to the criminal basic conditions and crime dimensions. There was no significant difference in other dimensions. There exist the problems of insufficient scientific consideration in cognitive in selection of evaluation factors. The scientific selection of evaluation factors and localized empirical research are necessary.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第7期55-61,共7页
Law Science Magazine
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"社区矫正的风险评估与管控机制研究"(项目编号:11YJA820018)阶段性研究成果
关键词
社区矫正
风险评估因素
结构差异
community correction factors of risk assessment structural differences