摘要
目前,我国刑事诉讼法律对于检察机关适用职务犯罪技术侦查措施做以明确规定,但是仍有一些不完善之处。通过以与国外职务犯罪技术侦查措施适用比较研究为视角,在借鉴国外关于职务犯罪技术侦查措施适用的法律规定和侦查实践的基础上,应注意四个平衡点的把握:首先,在基本概念方面应做到对于职务犯罪技术侦查措施内涵外延的明确;其次,在实体审查方面应注重职务犯罪技术侦查措施适用条件的严格;再次,在执行程序方面应确保职务犯罪技术侦查措施适用过程的正当;最后,在公民权利方面应保障公民私人权利救济的实现,从而以求最大限度地达到职务犯罪技术侦查措施适用与人权保障之平衡。
Currently, China' s Criminal Procedure Law has clearly provided the technical in- vestigation measures applied by the procuratorate to the duty crimes, but there still exist some de- gree of imperfection. In perspective of comparing the technical investigation measures to the duty crimes between China and abroad, and on the basis of learning the laws and investigation practices of the technical investigation measures to the duty crimes from foreign countries, this paper puts forward four key points to be reconsidered by the Criminal Procedure Law: Firstly, in terms of the basic concept, the law should clarify the connotation and denotation of the technical inves- tigation measures to the duty crimes; Secondly, in respect of the substancial review, the law should be strict with the application standards of the technical investigation measures to the duty crimes; Thirdly, in the aspect of enforcement procedure, the law should ensure the due application process of the technical investigation measures to the duty crimes; Finally, in the civil rights field, the law should safeguard the implementation of remedy for the private rights. By carrying out the above four suggestions, the paper alines to garantee the Criminal Procedure Law to strike a balance between the technical investigation measures to the duty crimes and human rights protection to the utmost.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第7期117-124,共8页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
职务犯罪
技术侦查措施
人权保障
比较研究
duty crimes technical investigation measures human rights protection comparative study