期刊文献+

妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准应用对妊娠结局的影响 被引量:6

Influence of new diagnostic criteria for GDM on pregnancy outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准在临床应用中对母儿妊娠结局的影响。方法回顾性对比分析清华大学玉泉医院2011至2012年2 000例孕妇分别应用新旧诊断标准后其妊娠结局改变情况。结果①妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)检出率由旧标准6.60%升高到新标准15.50%;②新标准组妊娠期高血压、羊水过多、早产、巨大儿、胎儿窘迫、新生儿低血糖及剖宫产率均显著低于旧标准组,且差异有统计学意义(x~2值分别为4.475、4.546、6.650、7.992、15.442、16.563、16.733,均P<0.05),而两组胎膜早破、胎儿生长受限及新生儿窒息差异无统计学意义(x~2值分别为1.657、2.168、2.582,均P>0.05);③观察组和正常组分别与研究组比较,母体并发症、胎儿并发症、新生儿并发症和剖宫产发生率均明显降低,其差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论新GDM诊断标准应用后增加了GDM检出率,使更多的GDM孕妇被及时诊断并给予临床干预,从而降低母儿并发症及剖宫产率,对改善母儿妊娠结局具有重要意义。 Objective To investigate the influence of new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ) on pregnancy outcomes.Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted to review and compare the changes of pregnancy outcomes of 2 000 women diagnosed with old and new diagnostic criteria for GDM respectively in the period of 2011 to 2012 in Yuquan Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University.Results The detection rate of GDM increased from 6.60%with old diagnostic criteria to 15.50% according to new criterion . The rates of hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy , polyhydramnios, premature delivery, macrosomia, fetal distress, neonatal hypoglycemia and cesarean section were significantly lower in the group diagnosed with new criteria than in the group with old criteria (χ^2 value was 4.475, 4.546, 6.650, 7.992, 15.442, 16.563 and 16.733, respectively, all P〈0.05), but there were no significance differences in the rates of premature rupture of membrane , fetal growth restriction and neonatal asphyxia (χ^2 value was 1.657, 2.168 and 2.582, respectively, all P〉0.05).Compared with study group, there were significant differences in the rate of maternal complication , complication of newborn, complication of fetal and cesarean section in observation group and in control group (all P〈0.05).Conclusion The detection rate of GDM is increased by applying new diagnostic criteria , and more pregnant women of GDM are timely diagnosed and treated, which can reduce the incidence of complications of mother and infant and the rate of cesarean section and then improve maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy .
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2014年第3期397-400,共4页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 妊娠期糖尿病 新诊断标准 妊娠结局 影响 gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) new diagnostic criteria pregnancy outcomes influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:325.
  • 2谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 3Sun Y, Yang H X, Sun W J. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia in Chinesepregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism[ J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet,2008,99 ( 7 ) :714-717.
  • 4杨慧霞.2011年妊娠期糖尿病国际诊断标准解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(4):19-20. 被引量:91
  • 5杨慧霞.妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准应用后面临的问题[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2012,13(3):161-162. 被引量:55
  • 6Consensus P, Metzger B E. Gabbe S G, et al. International association of diabetes and pregancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy [ J]. Diabetes Care, 2010,33 (3) :676-682.
  • 7Moses R G, Morris G J, Petocz P, et al. The impact of potential new diagnosticcriteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus inAustralia[ J]. Med J Aust,2011,194(7 ) :338-340.
  • 8梁莹,林慧文,高晓波.妊娠期糖尿病新诊断标准的临床应用观察[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(13):52-53. 被引量:2
  • 9魏玉梅,杨慧霞.妊娠期糖尿病不同诊断标准适宜性的比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2011,46(8):578-581. 被引量:146
  • 10Landon M B, Spong C Y, Thom E, et al. A multicenter randomizedtrial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes[ J]. N Engl J Med,2009,361 (14) :1339-1348.

二级参考文献37

  • 1周莉,吴连方.妊娠合并糖尿病并发症的诊断及处理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(6):417-420. 被引量:14
  • 2无.妊娠合并糖尿病临床诊断与治疗推荐指南(草案)[J].中华围产医学杂志,2007,10(4):283-285. 被引量:150
  • 3American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2004, 27: 88-90.
  • 4Langer O, Yogev Y, Most O, et al. Gestational diabetes: the consequences of not treating. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005,192 : 959 -997.
  • 5Fan ZT, Gao XL, Yang HX. Popularizing labor analgesia in China. Int J Gynecol Obstet,2007 ,98 :205-207.
  • 6Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med,2005,352 : 2477 -2486.
  • 7Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. A muhicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med,2009,361 : 1339-1348.
  • 8American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care ,2010,33 : 11-61.
  • 9Hadar E, Oats J, Hod M. Towards new diagnostic criteria for diagnosing GDM: the HAPO study. J Perinat Med,2009 ,37 :447- 449.
  • 10American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care,2011,34:62-69.

共引文献1799

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部