摘要
目的探讨临床路径在无痛人工流产中的应用价值及可行性。方法将440例行无痛人工流产患者分为临床路径组及非临床路径组(各为220例),比较门诊无痛人工流产术临床路径组与非临床路径组在费用、患者就诊时间及满意度等方面的差别。结果与非临床路径组相比,无痛人工流产临床路径组费用明显下降(t=30.05,P<0.05),就诊花费时间缩短(t=8.61,P<0.05),满意度提高(x~2=6.05,P<0.05),人工流产并发症明显减少(x~2=6.05,P<0.05)。结论门诊无痛人工流产可以实行临床路径管理,流程优化及降低费用效果明显,并发症明显减少。
Objective To investigate the application and feasibility of clinical pathway in painless artificial abortion .Methods Totally 440 patients undergoing painless artificial abortion were divided into clinical pathway group and non -clinical pathway group with 220 cases in each group.The expenses, total visiting time and satisfaction degree were compared between two groups .Results Compared with the group of non-clinical pathway, the expenses of the group of clinical pathway were significantly less (t=30.05,P〈0.05), total visiting time was significantly shorter (t=8.61,P〈0.05), the satisfaction degree was significantly higher (χ^2 =6.05,P〈0.05), and the incidence of complications was significantly lower (χ^2 =6.05,P 〈0.05).Conclusion It is feasible to apply clinical pathway in the outpatients undergoing painless artificial abortion .Applying clinical pathway can optimize process , cut down expenses and reduce complications significantly .
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2014年第3期525-527,共3页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
临床路径
无痛人工流产
费用
就诊时间
满意度
clinical pathway
painless artificial abortion
expense
total visiting time
satisfaction degree