PIVAS调配50ml注射液两种加药方法的比较

Comparison between two methods of dispensing 50 ml injection in Pharmacy intravenous admixture service

目的:探讨用50ml注射器和用一次性输液连通管,两种加药方法的工作效率。方法:总共12个工作日,两种加药方法各6d,前6d用50ml注射器加药,后6d用一次性输液连通管加药,每天统计出调配每袋输液所需的平均时间,进行两组间比较。结果:用50ml注射器调配每袋输液平均需52.23 s;用一次性输液连通管调配每袋输液平均需35.75 s。两组间差异显著。结论:用一次性输液连通管调配,既省时又省力,工作效率明显提高。

Objective：To explore the Influence on PIVAS work efficiency of the two methods that dispensing 50ml injection into infusion solutions with 50ml syringe or disposabletransfusion connecting pipe in pharmacy intravenous admixture service（PIVAS）.Methods：In total of 12 working days, each method is used for 6 days, centrally dispensing a pipe of 50ml pulse-activating injection to join the 50ml infusion solutions every day,and the operation should be completed by the same man. The first 6 days dispensing with a 50ml syringe and the last six days dispensing with the disposable transfusion pipe, statistic the time of the 50 bags infusion deployment required every day, comparing the results of two groups.Results：On average, it needs 52.23 second to dispense a bag of infusion with 50ml syringe,37.75 second for thedisposable transfusion connecting pipe, the differences between the two groups is significant. Conclusion：It saves time and effort to dispense with disposabletransfusion connecting pipe,the work efficiency is improved obviously.