期刊文献+

采用 SROC 曲线法系统评价端粒酶检测筛查肺癌的效果 被引量:2

Systematic reviews in the telomerase activity testing for screening lung cancer by use of SROC curve method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用SROC曲线方法系统评价端粒酶在肺癌诊断中的临床意义。方法以“端粒酶”和“肺癌”为主题词,对近20年公开发表的学术期刊进行检索,纳入文献并收集数据,利用Meta-DiSc 1.4软件进行SROC分析。结果1.取样为组织标本的22篇文献,异质性比较大(P=0.017),应用随机效应模型对数据分析,合并灵敏度和特异度分别是0.788(0.761~0.814)和0.955(0.936~0.969),SROC曲线下面积AUC为0.9515,SE( AUC)=0.0145;2.取样为灌洗液标本的10篇文献,不存在异质性(P=0.633),应用固定效应模型对数据分析,合并灵敏度和特异度分别是0.777(0.734~0.816)和0.922(0.888~0.948),SROC曲线下面积AUC为0.9369,SE(AUC)=0.0141。结论端粒酶是一种较理想的肿瘤标记物,尤其是肺泡灌洗液中端粒酶的活性检测用于辅助临床诊断具有较高的稳定性和准确度。 Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of telomerase in the diagnosis of lung cancerusing SROC curve method.Methods Looking“telomerase”and“lung cancer”as keywords,retrieving journalspublished within past 20 years in order to incorporate into literatures and to collect data .To conduct the SROC analysisusing Meta -DiSc 1.4 software.Results 1.Twenty -two documents were sampled as tissue specimensand the heterogeneity was relatively large (P =0.017).To analyze the data with random effective models ,thecombined sensitivity and specificity were 0.788(0.761 -0.814)and 0.955(0.936 -0.969),respectively.TheSROC AUC area under the curve was 0.9515,SE(AUC) =0.0145.2.There was no heterogeneity(P =0.633)amongthe 10 lavaged literatures.By use of fixed effects model for data analysis ,the combined sensitivity and specificitywere 0.777(0.734 -0.816) and 0.922(0.888 -0.948),and SROC AUC area under the curve was0.9369,SE(AUC) =0.0141.Conclusion Telomerase is a ideal tumor marker,and the detection of telomeraseactivity in lavage fluid is stable and accurate in clinical diagnosis .
出处 《实用肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2014年第3期207-212,共6页 Practical Oncology Journal
基金 基金项目:黑龙江省卫生厅科研课题(2010-232)
关键词 SROC 端粒酶 肺癌 SROC Telomerase Lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

二级参考文献101

共引文献86

同被引文献60

  • 1Chu H, Cole SR.Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59(12) : 1331 - 1332; author reply 1332 -1333.
  • 2Reitsma JB, Glas AS,Rutjes AW,et al.Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews[ J ].J Clin Epidemiol, 2005,58( 10) : 982 -990.
  • 3Harbord RM, Whiting P, Sterne JA, et al.An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary [ J ].J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(11): 1095 -1103.
  • 4Naaktgeboren CA, van Enst WA, Ochodo EA, et al.Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies[ J].J Clin Epidemiol,2014,67( 11) : 1200 - 1209.
  • 5Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, et al.Analysing and presenting results [ S/OL]//Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.The Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.( 2010-12-23 ) [2014-09-26].http ://srdta.cochrane.org/.
  • 6Deeks JJ.Systematic reviews in health care; systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests[ J].BMJ,2001,323 (7305) : 157 -162.
  • 7徐毛冶,刘艳茹,张青梅.不同采样技术对社区获得性肺炎病原学的诊断价值[J].国际呼吸杂志,2009,29(20):1232-1233. 被引量:2
  • 8祝慧萍,方龙,夏欣,林嵩艺,宇传华.双变量模型在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2010,39(1):78-81. 被引量:10
  • 9焦洋,白冲.支气管肺泡灌洗在肺部真菌感染中的诊断价值[J].中国真菌学杂志,2010,5(5):316-320. 被引量:15
  • 10任朝凤,郑勤玲,杨艳霞.纤支镜肺泡灌洗治疗肺脓肿的临床研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2011,16(5):774-774. 被引量:18

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部