期刊文献+

道德自我调节对亲社会倾向的影响及其年龄效应 被引量:13

The Effects of Moral Self- Regulation on Prosocial Intention and Age Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的道德自我调节对亲社会倾向的影响及年龄效应。方法 139名初中生和77名大学生,分别随机分为3组,运用不同道德效价的形容词和非道德形容词撰写一篇记叙文。之后填写青少年亲社会倾向量表(PTM),考察其亲社会倾向。结果青少年不道德事件启动组被试的亲社会倾向显著高于道德事件启动组(t=0.56,P<0.01)和对照组的亲社会倾向(t=0.42,P<0.05);成人不道德事件启动组被试的亲社会倾向显著高于对照组(t=0.19,P<0.05),而道德事件启动组的亲社会倾向显著低于对照组(t=-0.18,P<0.05)。结论道德净化效应出现在青年期和成年早期,而道德心理许可效应只出现于成年早期,说明青少年时期是道德自我的发展时期,道德自我成熟于成年早期。 Objective To study the effects of moral self -regulation on prosocial intentions and age effect .Methods A total of 139 middle school students and 77 college students were divided into three groups respectively .They recalled their recent concrete ( im) moral and unmoral behavior using different adjectives ,and then finished Prosocial Tendencies Measure ( PTM) .Results Adolescences who re-called their recent concrete immoral behavior reported greater prosocial intentions than individuals who recalled their recent concrete mor -al behavior and the matched group (F=220.3,P〈0.01).Young adults who recalled their recent concrete immoral behavior and moral behavior reported greater prosocial intentions than the matched group (F=8.73,P〈0.01).Conclusion Moral self-regulation can in-fluence prosocial intention;There is age difference in moral licensing effect.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第8期1240-1242,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"学生亲社会行为的促进:理论和方法"(编号:10JJDXLX002) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"辽宁省青少年亲社会行为形成规律的时代特征及促进"(编号:L12DSH026)
关键词 亲社会倾向 道德净化效应 道德心理许可效应 年龄效应 Development psychology Prosocial tendency Moral cleansing effect Moral licensing effect Age effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin D L. Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners The Paradox of Moral Self - Regulation [ J ]. Psychological science, 2009,20(4) :523-528.
  • 2Barry H, Tyler T R. The Other Side of Injustice When Unfair Proce- dures Increase Group - Serving Behavior [ J ]. Psychological science, 2009,20 ( 8 ) : 1026-1032.
  • 3Jordan J, Mullen E, Mumighan J K. Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior [ J ]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2011,37 ( 5 ) : 701-713.
  • 4石伟.道德心理许可研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(8):1233-1241. 被引量:17
  • 5寇彧,洪慧芳,谭晨,李磊.青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):112-117. 被引量:175
  • 6Conway P, Peetz J. When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior[ J ]. Personality and So- cial Psychology Bulletin,2012,38(7 ) :907-919.
  • 7Merritt A C, Effron D A, Monin B. Moral Self - Licensing: When Be- ing Good Frees Us to Be Bad [ J ]. Social and personality psychology compass ,2010,4(5 ) :344-357.
  • 8Brown R P, Tamborski M, Wang X, et al. Moral credentialing and the rationalization of misconduct [ J ]. Ethics & behavior, 2011,21 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
  • 9Johnston M, Krettenauer T. Moral self and moral emotion expectancies as predictors of anti - and prosocial behaviour in adolescence: A case for mediation? [J]. European Journal of developmental psychology, 2011,8(2) :228-243.
  • 10王红姣,卢家楣.中学生自我控制能力问卷的编制及其调查[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1477-1482. 被引量:118

二级参考文献39

共引文献367

同被引文献132

引证文献13

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部