期刊文献+

基于稳定同位素比值鉴别鱼翅干制品的品质 被引量:4

Identification of the Quality of Dried Shark Fins Products Based on Stable Isotope Ratio
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立了基于元素分析-同位素比值质谱联用技术(EA-IRMS)分析鉴别鱼翅干制品品质的方法。在测定真鱼翅干制品的稳定碳、氮同位素组成的基础上,获得了真鱼翅干制品的δ13C值、δ15N值区间,通过对比待测样品与真鱼翅样品之间的差异,进而对待测样品进行真假鉴别。利用本方法共测定了24份鱼翅样品的碳氮同位素比值,结果发现:真鱼翅和假鱼翅的碳氮同位素比值有着显著差别,真鱼翅样品的δ13C和δ15N值分别分布在-16.553‰^-11.065‰和8.803‰~19.122‰之间;而假鱼翅样品的δ13C和δ15N值范围分别为-18.122‰^-16.507‰和6.253‰~7.313‰。通过碳氮同位素比值这两个指标的综合判定,得到24个鱼翅样品中有11个假鱼翅样品。该方法可简便、快速地鉴别鱼翅干制品的品质,同时可弥补PCR检测技术无法判断用鲨鱼下角料压模而成的鱼翅干制品的局限性。 By determining stable carbon and nitrogen isotope composition of large quantities of real dried shark fins products, the δ13C and δ15N value scopes were obtained. The samples can be identified by the comparison of carbon, nitrogen isotope compositions between real shark fins products and them. The carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of 24 dried shark fins products were determined by element analyzer- isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS). Obvious difference in carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios was between real dried shark fins products and fake ones. The δ13C and δ15N values of real shark fins products ranged from -16.553‰ to -11.065‰ and 8.803‰ to 19.122‰, respectively, while those of fake shark fins products ranged from -18.122‰ to -16.507‰ and 6.253‰ to 7.313‰. Eleven samples were distinguished as fake shark fins products from all the 24 samples by the comprehensive judgment of the two indicators. This method is fast and convenient, and can be used to evaluate the quality of dried shark fin products. In addition, for those fake dried shark fins products made by leftover material of shark, which cannot be judged by PCR technique, this method can be applied to clearly differentiate real dried shark fins products with them, thus can remedy the defect of PCR method.
出处 《现代食品科技》 EI CAS 北大核心 2014年第6期289-293,共5页 Modern Food Science and Technology
基金 国家质检总局科技计划项目(2013QK278)
关键词 δ13C值 δ15N值 鱼翅干制品 掺假掺伪 δ13C value δ15N value dried shark fins products adulteration
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1黄文胜,韩建勋,董洁,邓婷婷,王娉,吴亚君,陈颖.FINS方法鉴定鱼翅和鲨鱼软骨的鲨鱼种类[J].食品科技,2011,36(11):265-271. 被引量:9
  • 2郭云霞,冒海琳,张舒亚,张瑞灏,谌鸿超,杨哲,包建强.鱼翅的分类及鉴别方法[J].食品工业,2011,32(6):96-99. 被引量:15
  • 3徐凤香,高昕,李昭勇,许加超,薛长湖.鱼翅营养成分提取及定性分析[J].食品工业科技,2007,28(1):225-227. 被引量:16
  • 4鲍伦军,杨建成,何振华,杨晓云,梁伟大.鱼翅中硫酸软骨素的酶解-高效液相色谱法测定[J].分析测试学报,2002,21(5):59-61. 被引量:18
  • 5Shelley C Clarke, Jennifer E Magnussen, Debra L Abercrombie, et al. Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market based on molecular genetics and trade records [J]. Conservation Biology, 2006, 20(1): 201-211.
  • 6Aranishi F, Okimoto T, Izumi S. Identification of gadoid species (Pisces, Gadidae) by PCR-RFLP analysis [J]. J. Appl. Genet., 2005, 46(1): 69-73.
  • 7Blanco M, Porez-Martin RI, Sotelo CG. Identification of shark species in seafood products by forensically informative nucleotide sequencing (FINS) [J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56(21): 9868-9874.
  • 8Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hinni C. Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges [J]. Trends Biotechnol., 2005, 23(7): 359-366.
  • 9Woolfe M, Primrose S. Food forensics: using DNA technology to combat misdescription and fraud [J]. Trends Biotechnol., 2004, 22(5): 222-226.
  • 10Yancy Haile F, Zemlak Tyler S, Mason Jacquline A, et al. Potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: applications of the regulatory fish encyclopedia [J]. J. Food Prot., 2008, 71(1): 210-217.

二级参考文献109

共引文献82

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部