评价理论框架下中英文学术书评的态度资源对比分析

Contrastive Analysis of Attitudinal Resources of Chinese and English Academic Book Reviews under the Framework of Evaluation Theory

学术书评作为一种重要的学术语类,富含评价资源,越来越受到学者们的重视。本文在评价理论框架下,通过随机选取的中英文学术书评各十篇作态度资源的定性和定量分析,发现为了使自己的评价显得客观,书评作者很少使用情感和判断资源,而比较青睐鉴赏。中西方文化语境下这一现象的跨语言跨文化一致性,说明学术书评这一语类对评价资源中态度意义的表达具有相似的制约性。

Academic book review, as an important academic genre, is rich in appraisal resources, and more and more attach the attention of scholars. This paper, under the framework of evaluation theory, through qualitative and quantitative analysis of attitudinal resources toward Chinese and English academic book reviews respectively ten pieces randomly selected, finds that in order to make their evaluation be objective, the book reviewer rarely uses emotional and judgment resources, but prefer appreciation. The cross - language and cross - cultural consistency of the phenomenon in Chinese and western cultural contexts, illustrates that this genre of academic book review has similar restriction for the attitudinal exoresses in aooraisal resources.