期刊文献+

经腹及经阴道超声对宫角妊娠诊断价值的对比观察 被引量:14

Comparative Observation on Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography in the Diagnosis of Cornual Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经腹及经阴道超声对宫角妊娠的临床诊断价值。方法选取2010年3月至2012年2月绵阳市中心医院收治的106例经手术及病理确诊的宫角妊娠患者,回顾性分析其经腹及经阴道超声检查情况,比较两种诊断方式的准确性。结果经阴道超声检查确诊85例,确诊率为80.2%,误诊15例,误诊率为19.8%;经腹超声检查确诊64例,确诊率为60.4%,误诊42例,误诊率为39.6%,两种超声检查确诊率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经阴道检查对宫角妊娠的确诊率较高,较经腹超声检查优势显著,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of uterine cornual pregnancy.Methods A total of 106 patients admitted to Mianyang Central Hospital Sichuan Province from Mar.2010 to Feb.2012 were selected,and a retrospective analysis of the transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound examination was done,and the accuracy of the two diagnostic methods was compared.Results Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosed 85 cases,the diagnosis rate was 80.2%,misdiagnosed 15 cases (19.8 %) ; transabdominal ultrasound examination confirmed 64 cases,the diagnosis rate was 60.4%,misdiagnosed 42 cases(39.6%),the difference between two kinds of ultrasound diagnosis rate was statistically significant(P 〈 0.05).Conclusion Transvaginal ultrasound examination has a significant higher diagnosis rate of corneal pregnancy than transabdominal ultrasonography,thus is worthy of clinical application.
作者 李娟 郑佳利
出处 《医学综述》 2014年第10期1895-1896,共2页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 经腹超声 经阴道超声 宫角妊娠 诊断 Transabdominal ultrasound Transvaginal ultrasound Cornual pregnancy Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献45

共引文献129

同被引文献73

  • 1李娟清,石一复.输卵管妊娠与其他部位异位妊娠的鉴别诊断[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(6):324-327. 被引量:39
  • 2曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.1348.
  • 3Nicola P, Filippo N, Stefano A, et al. Spontaneous comual pregnancy after homolateral salpingectomy for an earlier tubal pregnancy: A Case report and literature review [ J ]. Journal of Minimally lnvasive Gynecology, 2009,16(2) : 208-211.
  • 4MacRae R, Olowu O; Rizzuto M I, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of 11 consecutive cases of cornual ectopic pregnancy [ J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009,280( 1 ) :59-64.
  • 5Chpora S, Keepanasseril A, Rohilla M, et al. Obstetric morbidity and the diagnostic dilemma in pregnancy in rudimentary horn:ret- rospective analysis [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet ,2009,280 (6) :907 - 910.
  • 6Lee GS, Hut SY, Kown L, et al. Diagnosis of early intramural ec- topic pregnancy[ J]. Clin Ultrasound ,2005,33 (4) : 190 - 192.
  • 7Habana A, Dokras A, Giraldo J, et al. Coruual heterotopic preg- nancy:Contemporary management options[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyne- col,2001,185 (2) :522.
  • 8Chin HY, Chen FP, Wang C J, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization- embryo transfer[ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2004,86(3) :411 -416.
  • 9Jansen RP, Elliott PM. Angularin trauterine pregnancy [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1981,58 (2) : 167 - 175.
  • 10De Witt C, Abbot J. Interstitial pregnancy : a potential for misdiag- nosis of ectopic pregnancy with emergency department ultrasonog- raphy [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med,2002,40 ( 1 ) : 106 - 109.

引证文献14

二级引证文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部