期刊文献+

工作投入如何影响员工建言:认知灵活性和权力动机的作用 被引量:20

The Mechanism of Job Engagement on Voice Behavior:The Moderating Effects of Cognitive Flexibility and Power Motive
下载PDF
导出
摘要 员工建言日益成为组织创新和变革的推动力,在学术界它也引起了广泛关注。以往研究多从社会交换的视角来探索建言的发生机制,而从社会认知的视角的研究则较为缺乏,本研究将弥补该不足。采用问卷调查法,从苏南地区企业单位选取368份有效配对样本,研究探索了员工的工作投入对其建言行为的影响机制,及认知灵活性和权力动机的调节作用。结果表明,工作投入对建言行为具有显著的正向影响,建言效能感在其中起着中介作用;认知灵活性正向调节工作投入与建言效能感之间的关系,权力动机负向调节建言效能感对工作投入和建言行为的中介作用。文章最后讨论了研究存在的局限,并对建言行为的未来研究做了展望。 Many contemporary organizations are placing a grea ter emphasis on voice behavior as a means of evalua ting their performance. To extend previous studies, the aim of the present study is to examine the rela tionship and mechanism between job engagement and voice behavior. Five scales were designed to measure the variables, namely job engagement, voice efficacy, cognitive flexibility, power motive and voice behav ior. Data were collected from 368 leaders and their subordinates of enterprises in the south of Jiangsu province. Conclusions are listed as follows : 1. Job engagement predicts employee voice positively. 2. Voice efficacy mediates the relationship between job en gagement and employee voice. 3. The moderating effect of work engagement voice behavior is partially and cognitive flexibility on mediated by voice efficacy. 4. Power motive moderates the mediated effect between job engagement and employee voice, inclu ding voice efficacy.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2014年第1期67-75,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(70902056 71372180) 浙江省自然科学基金(LY14G020010) 江苏省"青蓝工程"优秀青年骨干教师项目
关键词 建言行为 工作投入 建言效能感 认知灵活性 权力动机 voice behaviour job engagement voice efficacy cognitive flexibility power motive
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1段锦云.中国背景下建言行为研究:结构、形成机制及影响[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):185-192. 被引量:73
  • 2段锦云,魏秋江.建言效能感结构及其在员工建言行为发生中的作用[J].心理学报,2012,44(7):972-985. 被引量:75
  • 3段锦云,钟建安.工作满意感与建言行为的关系探索:组织承诺的缓冲影响[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(1):170-174. 被引量:24
  • 4Burris,E.R.,Detert,J.R.,& Romney,A.C.(2013).Speaking up vs.being heard:The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice.Organization Science,24 (1),22-38.
  • 5Demerouti,E.,Bakker,A.B.,de Jonge,J.,Janssen,P.P.,& Schaufeli,W.B.(2001).Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control.Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health,27,279-286.
  • 6Detert,J.R.,& Burris,E.R.(2007).Leadership behavior and employee voice:Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal,50 (4),869-884.
  • 7Edwards,J.R.,& Lambert,L.S.(2008).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods,12,1-22.
  • 8May,D.R.,Gilson,R.L.,& Harter,L.M.(2008).The psychological conditions of meaningfulness,safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,77,11-37.
  • 9Martin,M.M.,& Anderson,C.M.(1998).The cognitive flexibility scale:Three validity studies.Communication Reports,11,1-9.
  • 10Martin,M.M.,& Anderson,C.M.(2001).The relationship between cognitive flexibility and affinity-seeking strategies.Advances in Psychological Research,4,69-76.

二级参考文献95

共引文献148

同被引文献269

引证文献20

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部