期刊文献+

论宋代亲属财产争讼的司法艺术风格与精神 被引量:1

On the Artistic Style about Property Disputes among Relatives in Song Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对亲属间财产争讼频繁的社会变动情势,宋代法官擅于运用儒家人伦情理铸造亲民形象,在司法调解时重视以法促调、释法说理与解疑工作,以感化争讼者接受调解以息讼;当儒家人伦情理对于亲属间财产纠纷调处无效时,又不囿于情理,而是在证据定谳事实基础上转而依法判决。宋代法官这种能调则调、当判则判、调判结合、礼法并重的化解亲属间财产争讼的司法艺术风格与精神,无疑为我们认识宋代司法的近世化转型提供了一种崭新的视角,亦是对中国古代家产司法无确定性学说的一种纠偏,同时能对当下民事司法中轻忽依法判决、依赖强制性调解等问题的解决提供一定的历史镜鉴。 In the face of the frequent disputes about family property, the judges were good at using the confucian ethics to form an officially fostered man-of-the-people image in order to reclaim the interest-ed parties to accept the mediation. In addition, the judges paid attention to using the law to promote me-diation, explaining the law to reason things out and using the law to solve some doubts. When the confu-cian ethics can not mediate the disputes among family members for property, the judges were not stickler for ethical reason, but were determined to adjudicate according to law, which were based on legal facts decided by evidences. The artistic style and spirit of the judicature about family property in Song dynasty, in which the judges not only mediated as much as possible and adjudicated condignly, but also combined mediation with judgment and paid equal attention to the ethics and laws, unquestionably provided a new angle of view to better understand modern transformation in judicature in Song dynasty, and also rectified the wrong theory that the ancient Chinese judicature was not fixed. At the same time, the artistic style and spirit can provide a certain historical enlightenment and alert existing problems that the court do not pay attention to lawful judgment and rely on mandatory mediation in present judicial mediation.
作者 张本顺
出处 《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期156-164,共9页 Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社科基金2010年一般项目"宋代司法传统中的理性与经验研究"(10BFX020) 河南省社科规划项目"宋代司法官群体研究"(2012BFX016)的阶段性成果
关键词 宋代法官 亲属财产争讼 司法艺术风格和精神 judges in Song dynasty property disputes among the relatives the artistic style and spirit of the judicature
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1钱穆.理学与艺术[C]//宋史研究集(第七辑).台北:台湾书局.1974:2.
  • 2傅斯年.中国历史分期之研究[N].北京大学日刊,1918-4-17-23.
  • 3[日]内藤湖南.概括的唐宋时代观[C]//刘俊文.日本学者研究中国史论著选译:第一卷(通论).黄约瑟译.北京:中华书局,1992.
  • 4孟元老.东京梦华录(外四种)[M].上海:上海古典文学出版社,1956:311.
  • 5漆侠.中国经济通史:宋代经济卷(上册)[M].北京:经济日报出版社,1999.
  • 6徐松.宋会要辑稿[M].北京:中华书局,1957..
  • 7陈傅良.止斋先生文集[G]//四部丛刊.上海:商务印书馆,1936.
  • 8李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1962:10.
  • 9司马光.家范[G]//文渊阁四库全书.台北:商务印书馆,1983.
  • 10张本顺.宋代妇女奁产所有权探析及其意义[J].法制与社会发展,2011,17(5):79-96. 被引量:9

二级参考文献77

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部