期刊文献+

国外公共交通导向型城市发展研究综述——基于建筑环境对公共交通客流量影响的视角 被引量:2

Research review on foreign TOD urban development:based on the perspective of influences on transit ridership by built environment
原文传递
导出
摘要 梳理了国外公交导向型城市的最新研究成果,从建筑环境对公共交通客流量影响的角度,就公共交通导向型城市区域可达性、公交站距离、土地利用密度、多用途开发、规划和需求管理等六个方面的实践进行了分析总结,认为良好的区域交通可达性可以促进公交系统的使用;出发地或目的地距离公交站越近,人们越倾向于使用公共交通工具;提高公交站点附近的居住密度和就业密度可以增加公交客流量;公交站点附近的土地混合利用有利于增加公交使用;城市规划通过构建适宜步行的环境,可以促进公交系统的使用;提高公交出行率离不开公交、步行、骑行基础设施的改善等。 The purpose of this essay is to identify and summarize the current research relating to transit - oriented com- munities, provide experiences for China. This essay focuses on six key built environment factors that influence transit ridership: TOD- typed regional accessibility, distance to transit, density of land use, diversity, design and demand management. The re- sults show that good regional transit accessibility generally facili- tates transit use. There is a higher propensity to use transit if trip origins and destinations are located within close proximity to transit. Increasing residential and employment density near tran- sit can increase transit ridership. Locating a mix of land uses near transit will increase transit ridership. By creating environ- ments for walking, urban design can increase transit use. In- creasing transit uses need to be accompanied with improvements to the supply of transit and pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.
出处 《城市问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期26-31,共6页 Urban Problems
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13XJY011)
关键词 公交导向型开发 建筑环境 土地利用 公共交通客流量 transit oriented development built envi-ronment land use transit ridership
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Arrington, G. , Cervero, R. Effects of TOD on housing, park- ing, and travel: TCRP Rep ort 128. Washington DC: Transpor- tation Research Board [ EB/OL ]. http://onlinepubs, trb. org/ onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_128, pdf, 2013 - 02 - 15.
  • 2Kees Maat, Bert van Wee, Dominic Stead. Land use and travel behavior: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity - based theories [ J ]. Environment and Planning B : Planning and Design, 2005( 1 ) :33 -46.
  • 3Cervero, R. Growing smart by linking transportation and land use : Perspectives from California [ J ]. Built Environment, 2003 (1) :66 -78.
  • 4Badoe, M. , Miller, E. Transportation - land - use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling[ J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2000 (7) :235 - 263.
  • 5Cervero, R. , Duncan, M. Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs - housing balance or retail housing mixing? [ J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006 (4) :475 - 490.
  • 6Handy, S. Smart growth and the transportation - land use con- nection: What does the research tell us? [ J]. International Regional Science Review, 2005 ( 2 ) : 146 - 169.
  • 7Gordon, P. , Richardson, H. Defending suburban sprawl[ J]. Public Interest, 2000 ( 3 ) :65 - 73.
  • 8Jun, M. Are Portland' s smart growth policies related to reduced automobile dependence? [J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2008( 1 ) :100 - 107.
  • 9Bento, A. , Cropper, M. , Mobarak, A. , Vinha, K. The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States [ J ]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005 (3) :466 - 478.
  • 10Filion, P. The mixed success of nodes as a smart growth planning policy[ J]. Environ -ment and Planning B: Planning and De- sign, 2009 ( 3 ) :505 - 521.

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部