期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

美国促进教育公平发展的财政政策分析——基于美国典型地区教育财政改革的政策评估研究 被引量：2

Analysis of the Fiscal Policy to Promote Educational Equity Development in USA——Based on Policy Evaluation Study of Education Finance Reform in Typical Area of USA
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了促进教育公平发展,美国改革教育资源配置方式,变革教育财政政策。教育财政政策改革体现为:加强州政府统筹,增加州教育财政支出;学区为主筹措教育经费,强化学区责任;政府倾斜配置教育经费,支持贫穷学区。美国教育财政政策变革后,出现了教师工资提高,教师培训增多,教育技术更新,教育项目拓展,教育设施改善等效应。分析发现,制度合法性是财政政策变革的潜在影响因素,拨款预期和政策稳定性影响财政政策的变革,促进教育的改革是财政政策变革的首要目的。 In order to promote development of education equity, USA reforms educational resources allocation and makes changes education finance policy. The reform of education finance policy reflects the following contents： strengthening the state government co-ordination, and increasing the state education expenditure; raising school district based educational funds, and strengthening school district responsibility. Government inclines allocation of educational funds, and support poverty school district. After finance policy reform, teacher wages get higher, there are more teacher training opportunities, educational technology is updating,educational project is expanding and educational facility is improving, etc. Analysis shows that the legitimacy is the potential impact factors of fiscal policy reform, funding expectations and policy stability effects fiscal policy reform, and promoting education reform is the primary objective of fiscal policy reform.
作者 薛二勇
机构地区 北京师范大学中国教育政策研究院
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期93-98,共6页 International and Comparative Education
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"区域内城乡一体化义务教育发展路线图研究"(项目编号:71103018) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"北京市义务教育均衡发展的政策创新"(项目编号:11JYC015)的研究成果
关键词 教育公平 教育财政 政策评估 美国 Educational Equity Education Finance Policy Evaluation
分类号 G511 [文化科学—教育技术学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1薛二勇.论教育公平发展的财政政策创新——基于美国的政策分析[J].教育研究,2011,32(10):95-100. 被引量：15
  • 2Moynihan, D. P. Equalizing Education: In Whose Benefit? [ J ]. The Public Interest, 1972(29) : 69-89.
  • 3Sacks,D. It Will Murder the Middle Class[N]. New York Times, July 11,1990: A 14.
  • 4Tsang,M. C.,and H. R. Levin. The Impact of Intergovern- mental Grants on Education Spending [J ]. Review of Edu- cational Research, 1983,53 (3) : 329-367.
  • 5Adams,J. E.,and W. E. White. The Equity Conse- quences of School Finance Reform in Kentucky[J ]. Educa- tional Evaluation and Pohey Analysis, 1997,19 (2): 165- 184,165-184.
  • 6Evans,W., S. Murray, and R. Schwab. Toward Increased Centralization in Public School Finance. In Intergovemmen- tal Fiseal Relations [ M ]. R.C. Fisher, ed. New York : Kluwer Academic, 1997 : 139-172.
  • 7Picus, L. O. The Local Impact of School Finance Re- form in Four Texas School Districts [ J ]. Educational Evalu- ation and Pohey Analysis, 1994,16(4) : 391-404,391-404.
  • 8Roman,B. Organizational Structure and the Institutional Environment:The Case of Public Schools[J]. Administra- tive Science Quarterly, 1982(27 ) : 259-279.
  • 9Meyer,J. W.,and B. Rowan. Institutionalized Organiza-tions :Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony[ J ]. Amer- ican Journal of Sociology, 1977 ( 83 ) : 340-363.
  • 10DiMaggio,P. J.,and W. W. Powell. Introduction,in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis [ M ].W.W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio,eds. Chieago,IL:University of Chicago Press, 1991 : 1-40.

二级参考文献34

  • 1闵维方.加大投入力度确保优先发展[N].人民日报,2010-3-10.
  • 2Evans, W., S. Murray, and R. Schwab. Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses after Serrano [J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1997, (1).
  • 3Underwood, J. K. School Finance Adequacy as Vertical Equity [J]. University of Michigan Joumal of Law Reform, 1995, (3).
  • 4Heise, M. State Constitutions, School Finance Litigation, and the "Third Wave" : From Equity to Adequacy [J]. Temple Law Review, 1995, 6g.
  • 5Clune, W. H. The Shift from Equity to Adequacy in School Finance[J]. The World and I, 1993, (9).
  • 6Reschovsky, A. and J. Imazeki. The Development of School Finance Formulas to Guarantee the Provision of Adequate Education to Low Income Students in Development in School Finance 1997 [ R ]. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 1998. 121-148.
  • 7Augenblick, J. Recommendations for a Base Figure and Pupil-Weighted Adjustments to the Base Figure for Use in a New School Finance System in Ohio [R]. Report Presented to the School Funding Task Force, Ohio Department of Education, 1997.4.
  • 8Augenblick, J., K. Alexander, and J.W. Guthrie. Report of the Panel of Experts: Proposals for the Elimination of Wealth Based Disparities in Education [R]. Report Submitted by Ohio Chief State School Office T. Sanders to the Ohio State Legislature, 1995.
  • 9Augenblick, J.G., J.L. Myers, and A.B. Anderson. Equity and Adequacy in School Funding [J]. The Future of Children: Financing Schools. 1997, (3).
  • 10Chambers, J., and T. Parrish. State Level Education in Cost Analysis for Education Decisions: Methods and Examples, Advances in Educational Productivity, Volume 4. W.S. Barnett[M]. ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1994. 53.

同被引文献20

  • 1Steven A. Camarota, Karen Zeigler. Immigrant Population Hits Record 42.1 Million in Second Quarter of 2015 [R]. Center for Immigration Studies. August 2015.
  • 2Law P. Law 90-247-JAN. 2[ S ]. The Education Department of the United States, 1968 : 816~820.
  • 3Department of Education. Biennial Report to Congress on the Emergency Immigrant Education Program [ R]. Wash-ington, D. C. 1996-09-03.
  • 4Joseph L. Mahoney, Edward F. Zigler.Translating Science to Policy under the No Child Left behind Act of 2001 :Lessons from the National Evaluation of The 21st-century Commu- nity Learning Centers [ J ]. J Appl Dev Psychol, 2006,27 ( 4 ) : 282~294.
  • 5U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Eval- uation and Policy Development [ R ]. ESEA Blueprint for Reform,2010. 8-9,23.
  • 6LOpez M M. Mothers Choose: Reasons for Enrolling Their Children in a Two-way Immersion Program [J ]. Bilingual Research Journal, 2013,36(2) : 208-227.
  • 7LOpez L M,Tdpanes V. Latino Children Attending a Two-way Immersion Program in the United States:A Comparative Case Analysis [ J ]. Bilingual Research Journal, 2011,34 (2) : 142~160.
  • 8Scanlan M, Pahner D. Race, Power, and Equity within Two-way Immersion Settings [J ]. The Urban Review, 2009, 41(5):391-415.
  • 9Howard E R,Olague N,Rogers D. The Dual Language Pro- gram Planner:A Guide for Designing and Implementing Dual Language Programs [J]. Center for Research on Elli- cation, Diversity & Excellence, 2003 : 25.
  • 10Roberto G. Gonzales. Yong Lives on Hold:The College Dreams of Undocumented Students [ R ]. College Board Ad- vocacy, 2009. 23.

二级引证文献3

比较教育研究
2014年 第8期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部