期刊文献+

英语致使结构:最简方案视角下的研究及相关理论问题 被引量:9

English causative constructions:A minimalist account and some related theoretical issues
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于最简方案的基本精神对英语致使结构做出系统解释。本文认为两类机制可能导致英语致使结构不被接受:(a)句法机制,即致使结构的句法推导无法完成;(b)句法外的界面机制,即在"概念-意向"界面,句法运算获得的语义与现实世界知识不兼容。本文的研究也提供了较为充分的证据,表明主流研究中广泛采纳的"事体分解"与"抽象致使谓词"都不该纳入句法结构中。 This paper attempts to provide a minimalist account of the English causative constructions(ECCs).It is proposed that the unacceptability of ECCs is due to either of the two mechanisms:(a)The Syntactic Mechanism,according to which,an ECC will be unacceptable if its syntactic derivation cannot converge;(b)The Syntax-external Interface Mechanism,according to which,an ECC will be unacceptable if the semantics derived by syntactic computation is not compatible with the real world knowledge at the Conceptual-Intentional(C-I)interface.Our analysis provides fairly sufficient evidence that the widely adopted syntactic assumptions,i.e.event decomposition and abstract causative predicates,should be dispensed with in syntactic encoding.
作者 胡旭辉
机构地区 [英]剑桥大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期508-520,639,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Adger, D. 2003. Core Syntax [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 2Beavers, J. & A. Koontz-Garboden. 2013. In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anti- causatives [J]. Lingua 131: 199-216.
  • 3Biberauer, T. & I. Roberts. 2010. Subjects, tense and verb-movement [A]. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.). Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 263-302.
  • 4Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 5Borer, H. 2005a. Structuring Sense. Volume 1. In Name Only [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Borer, H. 2005b. Structuring Sense. Volume 2. The Normal Course of Events [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Cheng, L. & R. Sybesma.1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP [J]. Lin- guistic Inquiry 30: 509-542.
  • 8Chierchia, G. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences [A]. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert (eds.). The Unaccusativity Puzzle [C]. Oxford: OUP. 22-59.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures [M]. Dor- drecht: Foris.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework [A]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka & S. Keyser (eds.). Step by Step:Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik [C]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 89-156.

二级参考文献54

  • 1董燕萍,梁君英.走近构式语法[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):142-152. 被引量:175
  • 2陆俭明.“句式语法”理论与汉语研究[J].中国语文,2004(5):412-416. 被引量:179
  • 3张韧.认知语法视野下的构式研究[J].外语研究,2007,24(3):35-40. 被引量:47
  • 4Adger, D. Core Syntax [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford U- niversity Press, 2004.
  • 5Baker, M. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • 6Baker, M. On the structural positions of themes and goals [ A ]. Rooryck, J. & L. Zaring. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon [ C ]. Dordrecht : Kluw- er, 1988.7 - 34.
  • 7Borer, H. Structuring Sense, Vol I: In Name Only [ M ]. Oxford i Oxford University Press, 2005 a.
  • 8Borer, H. Structuring Sense, Vol H: The Normal Course of Events [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005b.
  • 9Evans & Levinson. The myth of language univer- sals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science [ J ]. Behavioral and Brain Sci- ences, 2009, 32 (5) : 429 -492.
  • 10Carter, R. J. Some linking regularities [ A ]. Lev- in, B. & C. Tenny. On Linking: Papers by Rich- ard Carter [ C ]. Cambridge, MA: Lexicon Pro- ject, MIT Center for Cognitive Science, 1976.1 -92.

共引文献7

同被引文献109

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部