期刊文献+

评价结果导向型管理和预算改革面临的概念和方法上的挑战 被引量:10

Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Evaluating Result-Oriented Management and Reform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,结果导向型管理和预算改革在全球广为流行。然而,这个看似主流的改革在实践中遇到了严峻的挑战。如何客观评价结果导向型管理和预算改革对国家治理的影响要求我们重新审视其概念的界定和方法的选择。论文建议对公共部门绩效的分析应从治理的视角重新定位,将制度、组织、文化等背景的分析嵌入对政府结果导向型管理和改革实践的评价之中。同时,在传统的回归分析方法之外,公共管理研究者们可以考虑借用DEA、SFA和MOSFCA等方法,并且拓展定性研究工具,尤其是案例研究在这个领域的应用。 Result- oriented management and budgeting reform has become a worldwide trend since the 1980 s. However,the so- called mainstream reform is facing serious challenges in practice. The evaluation of its impacts on policy- making and the improvement of public services calls for an examination of both conceptual and methodological difficulties. This paper views the result- oriented management and budgeting reform as a major tool to improve governance in general. Therefore,the analysis of the government performance shall integrate into the analysis of institutional,organizational,and cultural contexts. Meanwhile,researchers in public administration can apply DEA,SFA,and MOSFCA approaches into the assessment of efficiency and effectiveness of public services. Qualitative research,especially in- depth case study shall be enhanced.
出处 《公共行政评论》 CSSCI 2014年第3期55-70,178,共16页 Journal of Public Administration
基金 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<预算透明与廉洁政府建设> 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"公民参与和中国民主行政模式的建构"
关键词 结果导向型管理和预算改革 治理 流程改造DEA SFA MOSFCA Result-oriented Management and Budgeting Reform Governance Process Reform DEA、SFA
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Aigner, D. , Lovell, K. & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6( 1 ) :21 -37.
  • 2Andrews, M. (2005). Performance - Based Budgeting Reform. In Shah, A. Ed. Fiscal Management, Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series. The World Bank, Washington DC.
  • 3Andrews, M. (2010). Good Government Means Different Things in Different Countries. Governance, 23(1) :7 -35.
  • 4Bouckaert, G. , & Halligan, J. ( 2008 ). Managing Performance : International Comparisons. New York : Routledge.
  • 5Bourdeaux, C. (2008). Integrating Performance Information into Legislative Budget Processes. Public Performance & Management Review, 31 (4) :547 -569.
  • 6Behn, R. ( 2007 ). What All Mayors Would Like to Know bout Baltimore's CitiStat Pe~ormance Strategy. Washington, D.C. :The IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • 7Breul, J. (2007). GPRA-A Foundation for Performance Budgeting. Public Pe~ormance & Management Review, 30 ( 3 ) : 312 - 331.
  • 8Fфrsund, F. R. , Jansen, E. S. & Berg, S. A. ( 1992 ). Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth During the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking: 1980 - 1989. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94: 211 - 228.
  • 9Bjurek,H. , Hjalmarsson, L. & Fфrsund, F. R. (1990). Deterministic Parametric and Nonparametric Estimation of Efficiency in Service Production : A comparison. Journal of Econometrics 46 ( 1 - 2 ) 213 -227.
  • 10Castro, M. F. ( 2009 ). Insider Insights : Building A Results - based Management and Evaluation System in Colombia. Washington, D. C. :World Bank. Independent evaluation group(IEG).

同被引文献234

引证文献10

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部