期刊文献+

3.0TMR扩散加权成像不同b值的信号强度及ADC值下降率对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值 被引量:7

Diagnostic efficiency of decline rate of signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient with different b values for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions on diffusion-weighted 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨3.0 T MR扩散加权成像不同b值的信号强度及ADC值下降率对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值。方法对东南大学附属中大医院自2010年12月至2012年12月经手术病理证实的152例162个乳腺病灶(恶性85灶,良性77灶)行3.0 T MR DWI扫描,b值取0、400、800、1000 s/mm2,分别测量不同b值下乳腺病灶DWI信号强度及ADC值,计算DWI信号强度下降率(SIDR), SIDR=(低b值DWI病灶信号强度-高b值DWI病灶信号强度)/低b值DWI病灶信号强度及ADC值下降率( ADCDR),ADCDR=(低b值病灶ADC值-高b值病灶ADC值)/低b值病灶ADC值)。对所获得的资料采用两独立样本t检验进行统计学分析并采用ROC曲线评价SIDR值及ADCDR值的诊断效能。结果(1)0~400、400~800和800~1000 s/mm23组b值间良、恶性病灶SIDR差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。(2)3组b值间的SIDR对良恶性病变诊断的敏感性分别为61.2%、68.2%和67.1%,特异性分别为74.0%、85.7%和67.5%;诊断符合率分别为67.3%、76.5%和67.3%;阳性预测值分别为72.2%、84.1%和69.5%;阴性预测值分别为63.3%、71.0%和65.0%。(3)400~800、800~1000 s/mm2两组 b值间良、恶性病灶ADCDR差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。(4)两组b值间的ADCDR对良恶性病变诊断的敏感性分别为80.0%、65.9%,特异性分别为72.7%、65.0%;诊断符合率分别为76.5%、65.4%;阳性预测值分别为76.4%、67.5%;阴性预测值分别为76.7%、63.3%。结论不同b值的信号强度下降率及ADC值下降率对乳腺良恶病灶都具有鉴别诊断价值,且诊断效能以400~800 s/mm2间为最佳。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of decline rate of signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient with different b values for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions on diffusion-weighted 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging.Methods A total of 152 patients with 162 confirmed histopathologically breast lesions (85 malignant and 77 benign) underwent 3.0T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Four b values (0, 400, 800 and 1 000 s/mm2 ) were used.The signal intensity and ADC values of breast lesions were measured respectively.The signal intensity decline rate ( SIDR ) and apparent diffusion coefficient decline rate ( ADCDR) were calculated respectively.SIDR=( signal intensity of lesions with low b value-signal intensity of lesions with high b value )/signal intensity of lesions with low b value, ADCDR =( ADC value of lesions with low b value-ADC value of lesions with high b value )/ADC value of lesions with low b value.The independent sample t-test was employed for statistical analyses and the receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curve for evaluating the diagnosis efficiency of SIDR and ADCDR values.Results Significant differences were observed in SIDR between benign and malignant breast lesions with b values of 0-400, 400-800 and 800 -1 000 s/mm2.The sensitivities of SIDR for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were 61.2%, 68.2% and 67.1%, the specificities 74.0%, 85.7%and 67.5%, the diagnosis accordance rates 67.3%, 76.5% and 67.3%, the positive predictive values 72.2%, 84.1%and 69.5%and the negative predictive values 63.3%, 71.0%and 65.0% respectively.Significant differences were observed in ADCDR between benign and malignant breast lesions with b values of 400-800 s/mm2 and 800-1 000 s/mm2.The sensitivities of SDR for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions were 80.0% and 65.9%, the specificities 72.7% and 65.0%, the diagnostic accordance rates 76.5% and 65.4%, the positive predictive values 76.4% and 67.5% and the negative predictive values 76.7% and 63.3% respectively.Conclusion The decline rate of signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient with different b values may be used for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.And the diagnostic efficiency with b values of 400-800 s/mm2 is optimal.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第23期1804-1807,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 乳腺疾病 磁共振成像 弥散 信号强度 ADC值 Breast diseases Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Signal intensity ADC value
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1张静,安宁豫,程流泉,蔡幼铨,张爱莲,李席如,郭勇.1.5TMR乳腺扩散加权成像b值的优化[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(10):937-941. 被引量:19
  • 2朱萍,王亚非,黄昊,刘琴芳,谌业荣,单秀红,谭继善.MR扩散加权成像表观扩散系数在乳腺结节病变诊断中的应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(12):1117-1121. 被引量:36
  • 3顾雅佳,冯晓源,唐峰,彭卫军,毛健,杨文涛.乳腺肿瘤的MRI扩散特征及参数选定[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):451-456. 被引量:45
  • 4陈欣,闫锐,康华峰,郭佑民,赵暹,贺长安,张毅力.不同扩散梯度因子值的乳腺MR扩散加权成像对比研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2009,43(4):356-359. 被引量:21
  • 5Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E, et al. Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values[ J]. AIR Am Roentgenno,2009,193 : 1030-1035.
  • 6Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3. O-T breast MR imaging[ J ]. Radiology', 2010,256:64 -73.
  • 7Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors[ J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2011,196 :210-217.
  • 8Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation Of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? [ J ] . Radiology , 2009 , 253:341-351.
  • 9Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion- weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization [ J ]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,15:693-704.
  • 10Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application [ J ]. Magn Reson Med Sci,2008,7:23-29.

二级参考文献48

共引文献106

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部