期刊文献+

下颌阻生齿拔除涡轮钻法与骨凿法的应用对比 被引量:3

Application Comparison of Unplugging the Mandibular Teeth Drilling Method and Turbine Bone Chisel Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析高速涡轮钻法与传统骨凿法拔除下颌阻生齿的临床治疗效果。方法将80例下颌阻生齿患者按照奇偶数字法随机地均分为对照组与观察组,每组均为40例。对照组采用传统骨凿法治疗,观察组采用高速涡轮钻法治疗。结果(1)观察组手术时间为显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)观察组术后创口疼痛情况显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)观察组患者术后张口受限程度显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)观察组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论运用高速涡轮钻法治疗下颌阻生齿,疗效显著,术后并发症发生率低,值得在临床上加以推广并普及。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of unplugging mandibular teeth turbine drilling method and traditional bone chisel method. Methods 80 cases with mandibular teeth were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 40 cases in each group. The control group had mandibular teeth drilled method,and the observation group had turbine bone chisel method. Results( 1) The observation group operative time was significantly less than the control group,with statistical significance( P〈0. 05);( 2) The pain situation after wound was significantly better in the control group than in the observation group,with statistically significant difference( P〈0.05);( 3) The extent of mouth opening in the control group was better than in the observation group,with statistically significant difference( P〈0. 05);( 4) Postoperative complication rate in the control group was significantly lower than in the observation group,with statistical meaning( P〈0. 05). Conclusion High-speed turbo drilling method for the treatment of mandibular teeth has significant effect,with lower complication rate. So it is worth to be promoted and popularized in clinical practice.
出处 《黑龙江医学》 2014年第6期695-697,共3页 Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词 下颌阻生齿 高速涡轮法 骨凿法 张口受限 Mandibular teeth Mandibular teeth turbine drilling method Bone chisel method Trismus
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献69

  • 1程恩祥,马生洲.高速涡轮牙钻在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J].医学理论与实践,2004,17(11):1304-1305. 被引量:5
  • 2刘晖,张俊祥,王刚.高速涡轮钻与凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌阻生智齿效果的评价[J].中国康复,2005,20(3):177-177. 被引量:13
  • 3周建国,步中琦,朱亚芳.下颌第三磨牙阻生两种拔除术的并发症比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):250-252. 被引量:16
  • 4Susarla SM. Dodson TB. How well do clinicans estimate third molar extraction difficulty [ J ] ? J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,63 ( 2 ) : 191 - 199.
  • 5Garc′ia-Garc′ia A,Gude Sampedro F,G′andara Rey J,et al.Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,83:585-587.
  • 6Diniz-Freitas M,Lago-Mendez L,Gude-Sampedro F,et al.Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,45(1):23-26.
  • 7Susarla SM,Dodson TB.Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(1):83-88.
  • 8Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1977-1983.
  • 9Susarla SM,Dodson TB.How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,63(2):191-199.
  • 10Yuasa H,Kawai T,Sugiura M.Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,40(1):26-31.

共引文献134

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部