摘要
目的对比分析高速涡轮钻法与传统骨凿法拔除下颌阻生齿的临床治疗效果。方法将80例下颌阻生齿患者按照奇偶数字法随机地均分为对照组与观察组,每组均为40例。对照组采用传统骨凿法治疗,观察组采用高速涡轮钻法治疗。结果(1)观察组手术时间为显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)观察组术后创口疼痛情况显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);(3)观察组患者术后张口受限程度显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)观察组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论运用高速涡轮钻法治疗下颌阻生齿,疗效显著,术后并发症发生率低,值得在临床上加以推广并普及。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of unplugging mandibular teeth turbine drilling method and traditional bone chisel method. Methods 80 cases with mandibular teeth were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 40 cases in each group. The control group had mandibular teeth drilled method,and the observation group had turbine bone chisel method. Results( 1) The observation group operative time was significantly less than the control group,with statistical significance( P〈0. 05);( 2) The pain situation after wound was significantly better in the control group than in the observation group,with statistically significant difference( P〈0.05);( 3) The extent of mouth opening in the control group was better than in the observation group,with statistically significant difference( P〈0. 05);( 4) Postoperative complication rate in the control group was significantly lower than in the observation group,with statistical meaning( P〈0. 05). Conclusion High-speed turbo drilling method for the treatment of mandibular teeth has significant effect,with lower complication rate. So it is worth to be promoted and popularized in clinical practice.
出处
《黑龙江医学》
2014年第6期695-697,共3页
Heilongjiang Medical Journal
关键词
下颌阻生齿
高速涡轮法
骨凿法
张口受限
Mandibular teeth
Mandibular teeth turbine drilling method
Bone chisel method
Trismus