期刊文献+

场外交易市场民事纠纷解决机制研究 被引量:3

A Research on the Settlement Mechanism of Civil Disputes in the Over-the-Counter Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 场外交易市场的特殊主体、特殊交易制度、特殊融资产品和特殊监管制度导致场外交易市场纠纷呈现出了与交易所市场不同的类型和特点。现有证券市场纠纷解决诉讼机制天然不足,非诉机制严重缺失。完善场外交易市场纠纷解决应从诉与非诉两种路径展开,扩大证券民事诉讼受案范围,废除起诉条件的前置程序,完善代表人诉讼制度,实行因果关系推定和举证责任倒置,同时建立相互衔接的内、外部纠纷调解机制和完善的证券仲裁裁决机制。 Owing to the particularity of subject, transaction system, financing products and supervision system, disputes in the over - the - counter market have presented great differences in terms of types and characteristics from the exchange markets. Current litigation resolution mechanism on securities disputes is poor because of its inherent defects and the alternative resolution mechanism is deficient now. The dispute settlement mechanism in the over - the - counter market should be improved from litigation ways and non - litigation ways, such as enlarging the case scope of civil procedures, abolishing the prepositional procedures of the indicating conditions, perfecting the representative action system, carrying out the causation presumption, shifting the burden of evidence and establishing the internal and external mediation mechanism and arbitration mechanism.
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《政法学刊》 2014年第2期5-13,共9页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 2013年度天津哲学社会科学规划项目"非上市公司治理视角下我国场外交易市场监管法律制度研究"(TJFX13-005)
关键词 场外交易市场 民事诉讼 仲裁 over - the - counter market civil litigation arbitration
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献47

  • 1证券市场监管主体和监管方式的国际比较[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),1998,5(4):31-34. 被引量:4
  • 2刘家兴.论仲裁权[J].中外法学,1994,6(2):9-16. 被引量:14
  • 3天津文交所问题迭出 “三不管地带”急需落实对投资者的保护[J].东方收藏,2011(5):10-10. 被引量:1
  • 4D.L.Ratner:Securities Regulation (4^thed.),P.143.
  • 5Jonathan C. Dickey, Marcia Kramer Mayer: Effect on Rule 10B-5 Damages of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: A Forward-Looking Assessment, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 51.
  • 6H. R. CONF. REP. No. 369, 104th Cong, 1st Sess. 42 (1995).
  • 7最高人民法院.《关于审理证券市场因虚假陈述引发的民事赔偿案件的若干规定》第30条.,..
  • 8Robert Charles Clark, Corporate Law, at 332.
  • 9Richard W. Jennings, Harold Marsh. Jr, John C. Coffee Jr. & Joel Seligman, Securities Regulation, at 1149-54.
  • 10James D. Cox, Roher W.Hillman & Donald C. Langevoort, Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials, at 754-5.

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部