期刊文献+

轻比重与重比重布比卡因腰麻在剖宫产术中的作用比较 被引量:9

Comparison between intrathecal hypobaric bupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for caesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对 0 .12 5 %轻比重布比卡因与 0 .5 %重比重布比卡因腰麻在剖宫产术腰麻 -硬膜外联合麻醉( CSEA)应用中的麻醉效果及并发症进行比较。方法 随机选择 6 0例拟行剖宫产手术的产妇 ,平均分为两组 ,均采用 CSEA麻醉方法。分别向蛛网膜下腔注射 0 .5 %重比重布比卡因 1ml(重组 )与 0 .12 5 %轻比重布比卡因 4m l(轻组 )。结果 重组起效时间明显比轻组短 ,腰麻后 15分钟麻醉平面高于轻组 ( P均 <0 .0 1)。轻组 2 %利多卡因用量显著多于重组 ( P<0 .0 5 )。低血压发生率 :重组 43.3% ,轻组 16 % ;恶心呕吐发生率 :重组 2 6 .7% ,轻组 6 .7% ,具有显著性差异。轻组的腰麻平面消退较重组快 ( 33.4分钟对 6 1.7分钟 )。结论 轻比重药液与重比重药液相比更具有对下肢运动神经阻滞轻、对循环影响小的特点。 Objective Evaluating the effectiveness and complications by use of intrathecal injection of hypobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine for caesarean section.Methods Sixty term parturients were randomly divided into one of two groups and intrathecally recieved either:hypobaric group with 1ml of 0.125% bupivacaine and hyperbaric group with 4ml of 0.5% bupivacaine.Results The onset time of hyperbaric group was shorter and level of spinal anesthesia was higher than hypobaric group ( P <0.05 or P <0.01).The incidence of hypotension and nausea/vomitting was higher in hyperbaric groups ( P <0.05).Conclusions The combined spinal epidural technique,using hypobaric bupivacaine had advantages of less mobile nerves block and fewer complications than using hyperbaric bupivacaine.
作者 曲元 徐成娣
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 北大核心 2001年第2期80-82,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉 布比卡因 剖宫产 Combined spinal epidural anesthesia Bupivacaine Caesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Fan S Z,Anesth Analg,1994年,78卷,474页

同被引文献40

  • 1曹灵敏,李胜德,马桂芬,景卫.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(12):742-742. 被引量:236
  • 2陈百成,孟庆云,扈文海,丁文元,刘志双,刘彦辉,刘风珍,张杏梅.腰椎间盘突出症手术的麻醉[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15(2):91-92. 被引量:13
  • 3谢荣.麻醉学[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,1994:268.
  • 4张凤山,蔡钦林,玉永惕.手术疗法[M]//鲁玉来,蔡钦林.腰椎间盘突出症.北京:人民军医出版社,2001:220.
  • 5GALINDO A, HERNANDEZ J, BENAVIDES O, et al. Quality of spinal extradural anaesthesia: the influence of spinal nerve root diameter [J]. Br J Anaesth, 1975, 47(1 ):41-47.
  • 6LEE YY, NGAN KEE WD, CHANG HK, et al. Spinal ropivacaine for lower limb surgery : a dose response study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007, 105(8) : 520-523.
  • 7McDONALD SB, LIU SS, KOPACZ DJ, et al. Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine: a comparison to bupivacaine in volunteers [J]. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90(4): 971-977.
  • 8ROSENBERG PH, HEINONEN E. Differential sensitivity of A and C nerve fibres to long-acting amide local anaesthetics[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1983, 55(2): 163-167.
  • 9Bannister J.Ropivacaine:a preliminary clinical trial[J].Br J Anaesth,1989,63:237 -245.
  • 10Ford DJ.Differential peripheral nerve block by local anesthetic in the cats[J].Anesthesiology,1984,60:28-34.

引证文献9

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部