期刊文献+

湍流模型对高压比离心压缩机气动性能及流场结构影响的数值研究 被引量:5

Simulation Research of Effects of Turblence Model on the Aerody namic Performance and Flow Field Structure in High-press Ratio Centrifugal Compressor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究不同湍流模型对压缩机总体性能及内部流场数值模拟结果的影响,本文采用3个高雷诺数湍流模型和1个低雷诺数湍流模型对Krain实验研究的离心叶轮和等面积无叶扩压器进行三维定常流场计算,并与相应的实验结果进行对比。研究结果表明,4种湍流模型的数值模拟结果与实验结果均存在差异,这一差异与流量和转速有关。在高转速、小流量工况下,湍流模型对数值模拟结果的影响更为显著。数值模拟预测到的失速流量均与实验值差别较大。而从流场和总体性能两方面来看,与高雷诺数湍流模型相比,低雷诺数湍流模型的模拟精度更高,在设计工况附近区域,数值模拟的效率与实验符合良好。 In order to study the effects of different turbulence models on the predicted overall performance and flow field in the compressor, the 3D steady flow simulations were carried out on the Krain impeller and a vaneless diffuser of constant area by using three different high Reynolds number turbulence models and one low Reynolds number turbulence model. The numerical results were compared with the corresponding experimental results. The results show that, the numerical results of the four turbulence models don’t agree fully well with the experimental results, and the differences among them vary with both the mass flowrate and the rotation speed. The impacts of turbulence models on numerical results behave more significantly at the high-speed and low-flowrate operating points. The predicted stall points all departure from the experimental results. In terms of both the flow field and overall performance, the low Reynolds number turbulence model provides more accurate results than the high Reynolds number turbulence models do. Near the design operating condition, the predicted efficiencies by the numerical simulations are in good agreement with the experiment tested results.
机构地区 西安交通大学
出处 《风机技术》 2014年第3期13-21,共9页 Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.51236006)
关键词 湍流模型 叶轮 流场 总体性能 Krain turbulence model Krain impeller flow field overall performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Shabbir,A.aZhu,J.,and Celestina,M.,1996, "Assessment of Three Turbulence Models in a Compressor Rotor," ASME paper No.96-GT-198.
  • 2Roberts,D.A.,and Steed.R.,2004, "A Comparison of Steady-State Centrifugal Stage CFD Analysis to Experimental Rig Data," Proceedings of the ANSYS User' s Conference,Pittsburgh,PA.
  • 3康顺,刘强,祁明旭.一个高压比离心叶轮的CFD结果确认[J].工程热物理学报,2005,26(3):400-404. 被引量:37
  • 4Tamaki,H.,2010,"Effect of Recireulation Device on Performance of High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressor," ASME Paper No.GT2010-22570.
  • 5Krain,H.,Hoffmann,B.,and Pak,H.,1998, "Aerodynamic of Centrifugal Compressor Impeller With Transonic Inlet Conditions," ASME Paper No.GT95-79.
  • 6Krain,H.,Hoffmann,B.,1998, "Flow Physics in High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressors," ASME Paper No.GT98-24.
  • 7Hazby,R.H.,and Xu,L.,2009, "Role of Tip Leakage in Stall of a Transonic Centrifugal Impeller," ASME Paper No. GT2009-59372.
  • 8康顺,孙丽萍.叶根倒角对离心叶轮气动性能的影响[J].工程热物理学报,2009,30(1):41-43. 被引量:20
  • 9Denton.J.D., and Dawe,W.N.,1999, "Computational Fluid Dynamics for Turbomachinery Design." Proc.Inst.Mech.Eng, PartC:J. Mech. Eng.Sci.,213 ,pp. 107-124.
  • 10黄玉娟,李晓东,陈江.湍流模型对涡轮数值模拟结果的影响[J].工程热物理学报,2007,28(z1):97-100. 被引量:18

二级参考文献50

共引文献118

同被引文献128

引证文献5

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部