期刊文献+

政治的马克思何以可能?——自主主义马克思主义视域中的《1857—1858年经济学手稿》 被引量:1

How Can Political Marx Be Possible?——Grundrisse in the Horizon of Autonomist Marxism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自主主义马克思主义对《大纲》的激进政治阅读,旨在重建政治的马克思之可能性。他们将经济学语境重构为革命主体性话语和阶级斗争的革命政治学,将方法论理解为基于阶级对抗—主体性转型—创构性筹划的革命空间,并立足实质吸纳和一般智力视域,在当代资本主义生产方式的根本转型中,发掘新的政治主体模式和替代性的革命图景。这种解读路径力图走出纯粹客观层面的历史分析构架,确立阶级斗争的根本地位,并将社会转型的动力归结为阶级意志间的冲突,以突出马克思充足的主体性视域。然而,历史的彻底主体化、社会运行机制的过度简化和不确定的未来视域,使其不可避免地带有唯意志论的色彩和乌托邦的嫌疑。 The radical political reading by Autonomist Marxism manages to reconstruct the possibility of political Marx. They take its economic context as discourse of revolutionary subjectivity and revolutionary politics of class struggle, comprehend its methodology as revolutionary mechanism based on class antagonism-subjective transformation-constitutive project. Furthermore, established in real subsumption and general intellect, they discover new mode of political subject and alternative revolutionary prospect. This understanding path tries to move from historical analytical framework on pure objective aspect,institutes basic position and reducts motion of social transformation to conflict between class wills to give prominence to Marx's abundant subjective horizon. However,complete subjectivization of history, excessive reduction of social moving mechanism and uncertain future horizon make it inevitably possess voluntarist character and utopian suspicion.
作者 宋晓杰
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期58-65,共8页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(12CZX004)
关键词 自主主义马克思主义 政治的马克思 革命主体性 阶级对抗 唯意志论 Autonomist Marxism Political Marx Revolutionary Subjectivity Class Antagonism Voluntarism
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Antonio Negri. Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse [M]. Massachusetts; Bergin & Garvey Publishers, 1984.
  • 2Steve Wright. Storming Heaven:Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism[M]. London: Pluto Press, 2002 : 28.
  • 3马克思恩格斯全集:第30卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
  • 4马克思..资本论第1卷[M]..北京:人民出版社,,2004..328-329,292,334,631,327-329,328,575,662,664,10..
  • 5Jason Read. The Micro-Politics of Capital: Marx and the Prehistory of the Present[M]. New York: State University of New York Press, 2003 : 103.
  • 6Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Anti-Edipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983 : 11.
  • 7Antonio Negri. The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-First Century[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989 : 72.
  • 8Mario Tronti. The Stategy of the Refusal[M]//Working Class Autonomy and the Crisis: Italian Marxist Texts of the Theory and Practice of a Class Movement: 1964-79. London: Red Notes & CSE Books, 1979 : 10.
  • 9Paolo Virno. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life EM]. Los Angeles & New York:Semiotext,2004.
  • 10Paolo Virno. Notes on the "General Intellect"[M]// Marxism Beyond Marxism. New York · London: Routledge, 1996 : 265.

共引文献595

同被引文献17

  • 1[英]斯图亚特·西姆.德里达与历史的终结[M].王昆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:73.
  • 2Heinz Hartmann. Saving the Text, Literature/Derrida/ Philosophy[M]. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981:33.
  • 3[法]雅克·德里达.马克思的幽灵-债务国家,哀悼活动和新国际[M].何一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
  • 4M. Ryan. Marxism and Deeonstruction[M]. Baltimore and London, 1982 : 1.
  • 5马克思恩格斯选集:第2卷[M].中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1995:111-112.
  • 6[德]海德格尔.面向思的事情[M].陈小文,等,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996:59-60.
  • 7[英]特里·伊格尔顿.历史中的政治,哲学,爱欲[M].马海良,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999:122.
  • 8马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1995:274.
  • 9David Harvey. The New Imperialism[M]. Oxford University Press, 2003 : 116.
  • 10[英]克里斯蒂娜·豪维尔斯.德里达[M].张颖,等,译.哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2002:187.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部