司法确认制度及其价值的法哲学拷问——一个合法性范式分析视角

The Legal Philosophical Analysis of Judicial Reformation System and It's Value from the Perspective of Legitimacy Paradigm

以司法确认"定西经验"为研究范本,以谱系合法性、实质合法性和经验合法性作为合法性范式典型分类,司法确认制度在权力来源、价值衡量、社会支持等方面均要接受合法性范式检视。在反思合法性范式自身局限性基础上,在防范"偏至思维"前提下,司法确认制度整体合法性范式考量的宽容立场得以生成,但对司法确认制度试验能动式扩展其调整范围需要持以审慎立场。司法确认制度合法性范式分析呈现动态特性,当"法律精英主义"干预与社会自治水平处于此消彼长之时,司法确认制度需要接受合法性范式的重新洗礼。

The judicial reformation system＇spower origin, value weight and social support level by taking＂ Dingxi Expe rience＂as a research sample and regarding pedigree legitimacy, substantive legitimacy and empiricism legitimacy as typical legitimacy paradigm classification needs to be analyzed. On the basis of the reflection on the inherent limitations of legitima cy paradigm itself and the prevention of ＂extreme thinking＂, the tolerance stance as a whole to consider legitimacy para digm generated, but we must have prudent standpoint in expand its range of adjustment actively. As the legitimacy para digm has dynamic characteristic, the judicial reformation system need be reconsidered in legitimacy paradigm when the level of social autonomy transcend the interference of legal elitism.