期刊文献+

望远镜里的法经济学:理论架构和分析工具 被引量:8

Law and Economics:Theoretical Structure and Analytical Instrument
原文传递
导出
摘要 法律经济学是利用经济分析的架构探讨法学问题。在面对各种官司时,除了诉诸相关的法条之外,还要有意识地提醒自己:思索和分析的工具,到底是什么?法学里常把问题分为两类,程序问题和实体问题;透过程序,处理实体。经济分析也是如此,透过各种分析技巧,厘清问题;实质问题所涉及的价值取舍,通常是分析的第二步或第三步。在法学教育中,几乎很少提到"往前看"的观点;当"如何善后"变得纠缠不清时,"往前看"的视角往往能另辟蹊径、豁然开朗。最重要的是,法律经济学的方法论,是先建构了解社会的一般性、原则性理论,再以之探讨法学问题。经济分析的特色和说服力如何,最好让证据来说话。 Law and Economics applies economic analysis to study legal issues. Economic analysis covers a wide range and two important analytical frameworks are examined in the paper: the macro micro macro structure by Coleman, and the equilibrium analysis. The major contents of the paper are: first, in facing legal cases, it is important to conscientiously ask the question, "What are the analytical tools that have been employed to face the problems?" Secondly, legal issues are grouped into the substantive and the procedural ones; it is essentially the same in economics. The first step is to analyze the practical issues involved and the second or third step is to face the substantive issues concerning value judgments. Finally, the perspective of forward looking is often neglected in legal studies. When a useful hindsight is not readily available, adop ting a forward looking perspective is often illuminating. The most important message is that Law and Economics employs the methodological stance of developing a general theory about social phenomena in order to fruitfully study legal issues. Wheth er this stance is persuasive is to be judged by the evidence it produces.
作者 乔岳 熊秉元
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期40-50,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 波斯纳 法经济学 正义 均衡 Posner law and economics justice equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Coase, Ronald H. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 3:1 -44, 1960.
  • 2Hsiung, Bingyuan, Economics 0, I, 2--Illustrating the Core Insights of Economic Analysis[J]. Journal of Interdisciplinary E- conomics, 19 : 265 - 290, 2008.
  • 3I Posner, Richard A. , The Economics of Justice, Cambridge[M]. MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
  • 4North, Douglass C. , Institutions,Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge[M]. New York: Cambridge U- niversity Press, 1990.
  • 5Easterbrook, Frank, Foreword: The Court and the Economic System[J]. Harvard Law Review, 98:4 -60, 1984.
  • 6Posner, Richard A., Wealth Maximization Revisited[J]. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2( 1 ) : 855 - 106, 1985.
  • 7Hsiung, Bingyuan, A Methodological Comparison of Ronald Coase and Gary Becker[J]. American Law and Economics Review, 3(1) : 186 -198, 2001.
  • 8Hsiung, Bingyuan and Chao Wang, Reconciling Categorical Reasoning with Consequentialist Reasoing and Law with Moraihy [J].under review, 2013.
  • 9Hsiung, Bingyuan, The Commonality between Economics and Law [J].European Journal of Law and Economics, 15 ( 1 ) : 33 - 56, 2004.
  • 10Hsiung, Bingyuan, Sailing towards the Brave New World of Zero Transaction Costs[J]. European Journal of Law and Econom- ics, 8(2): 153-69, 1999.

同被引文献200

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部