程序法律论证基本问题研究

Research on Basic Issues of Procedural Legal Argumentations

获得合理的裁判结论最终是追求实体问题的合理解决,但在司法实践中往往只注重实体问题本身,忽视了程序性证明对实体性裁判结论的影响。法律论证由实体法律论证和程序法律论证组成,通过程序法律论证体系的构建,其所涉及的程序法规范论证、程序性事实论证、逻辑推理方法论证、程序性结论论证等能阐明其论证范围及对实体裁判结论的影响,以获得程序性证明体系的基本内容和方法。

To gain access to the reasonable judgment is ultimately in pursuit of proper resolution of sub -stantive issues .However in judicial practice , compared with the total concern of substantive issues , the proce-dural proof is often undervalued in affecting the substantive judgment .The legal argumentation consists of both substantive legal argumentation and procedural legal argumentation .The system establishment of procedural le-gal argumentation , which includes procedural norms argumentation , procedural facts argumentation , logic de-duction argumentation and procedural conclusion argumentation , will explicate the effect of argumentation scope on substantive judgment so as to obtain the basic content and methods of the procedural proof system .