期刊文献+

滞胀时期的“边界”扩张:政府行为与市场效率

Boundaries Expansion during Stagflation:Government's Behavior and Market Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英美等国在20世纪70年代面临滞胀而推进私有化改革,其演化逻辑是强调从政府干预到注重发挥市场作用,以自由市场替代国家干预、私有化替代国有化,它根据经济发展实际放弃政府过多干预,使得市场对资源配置重新发挥决定性作用。市场边界扩张过程或能提高政府效能和提高企业经营效率,促进经济发展,缓和劳资等社会矛盾,但由此也导致收入悬殊等问题。对比分析滞胀前后政府和市场边界演进逻辑可见,市场对资源配置具有决定性作用,政府需要通过自身改革以适应市场发展,政府和市场互补共生而非此消彼长,有效的市场对应着高效的政府,发挥市场机制作用应该把自由市场机制嵌入到可控的政府有效运行。 Confronted with the stagtlation in the 1970s, Britain and other countries adopt privatization reform, which is to emphasize the logical evolution from government intervention to the market, using market liberal instead of state interventionism, privatization instead of nationalization. According to the economic development situation, the state giving up too much government intervention, letting the market to play a decisive role in the allocation of resources. Market boundary expansion process is help to improve government and business efficiency, promote economic development, easing social conflicts labor, etc., but it also leads to disparity in income and other issues. Comparative analysis of stagflation between the evolution of government and market logic of the visible boundaries, the market has a decisive role in the allocation of resources, it is necessary to adapt the market mechanism to the comprehensiye reform, the government and market are complementary symbiotic, to form an effective and efficient socialist market economy, market mechanisms should play the decisive role in resource allocation process and the free market mechanism embedded in the effective operation of government-controlled.
作者 王华春 张璇
出处 《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期25-32,共8页 Reform
关键词 滞胀 私有化 政府和市场 市场经济与资源配置 stagtlation, privatization, government and market, market economy and allocation of resources
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Schmidt, K. M., Incomplete Contracts and Pri- vatization, European Economic Review, 1996, (40) : pp.569-579.
  • 2于维霈.英国私有化剖析[J].世界经济,1990,13(12):35-41. 被引量:4
  • 3李其庆.全球化背景下的新自由主义[J].马克思主义与现实,2003,55(5):4-18. 被引量:70
  • 4严海波,王姝.英国经济的结构性转变与英国政治(上)[J].国外理论动态,2006(12):13-18. 被引量:4
  • 5Martin S., Parker D. Privatization and Eco- nomic Performance throughout the UK Business Cycle. Managerial and Decision Economics,1995, (16) : pp.225-237.
  • 6Megginson, W. L., Nash, R., and Van Randen- borgh M. The Financial and Operating Perfor- mance of NEWLY Privatized Firms: An Intema- tional Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance, 1994, (49):pp.403-425.
  • 7Megginson, W. L., and Netter, J. M., From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39(2) :pp.321-389.
  • 8王皖强.撒切尔主义研究的几个问题[J].世界历史,1997(1):85-95. 被引量:2

二级参考文献13

  • 1李其庆.金融全球化的成因与特征[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(4):22-27. 被引量:7
  • 2《挑战华盛顿共识》[J].《布朗世界事务》杂志,2003,9(2).
  • 3罗伯特·库尔茨.《资本主义黑皮书——自由市场经济的终曲》下卷[M].,.第816-817页.
  • 4.[N].《文汇报》,1999年9月10日.
  • 5.[N].法国《费加罗报》,1999年10月6日.
  • 6托尼·安德烈阿尼.《社会主义是未来》[M].法国西莱普斯出版社,2001年版.第44页.
  • 7阿兰·G 纳塞尔.《私有化是资本主义的趋势》[M].,..
  • 8.[N].《参考消息》,2003年8月1日.
  • 9姜时学 等.《拉美反思新自由主义》.http.//www.cReader.com,2001—08—29.
  • 10大卫·M 科茨.《全球化与新自由主义》[J].《反思马克思主义》杂志,2002,14(2).

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部