期刊文献+

咪达唑仑应用于认知功能障碍患者腰椎穿刺检查的镇静效果观察 被引量:3

The sedative efficacy of Midazolam on patients with cognitive impairment in lumber puncture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察咪达唑仑在有认知功能障碍患者腰椎穿刺检查中的临床应用效果和安全性。方法将49例存在认知功能障碍并有腰椎穿刺指证的患者随机分为2组,分别应用靶控静脉泵入咪达唑仑(咪达唑仑组)和持续人为安抚制动(对照组)的方法下实施腰椎穿刺检查,比较2组间腰椎穿刺检查的完成率、检查中躁动发生率、检查后平卧4 h配合率及检查完成时间,同时动态观察记录咪达唑仑组用药前、检查中及检查后的心率、呼吸频率、血压及血氧饱和度变化情况。结果 2组患者腰椎穿刺检查完成率、检查中躁动发生率、检查后4h平卧率及完成时间均有显著性差异(P<0.01),咪达唑仑组用药前、检查中及检查后的心率、舒张压、呼吸频率及血氧饱和度无显著差异(P>0.05),收缩压下降明显(P<0.05),但波动于正常参考值范围内。结论咪达唑仑用于腰椎穿刺的镇静治疗安全有效,可作为伴有认知功能障碍患者检查时的用药选择。 Objective To evaluate the sedative efficacy of Midazolam on patients with cognitive impairment in lumber puncture (LP). Methods 49 patients with cognitive impairment were randomly divided into two groups: 25 patients were punctured under Midazolam sedation (Midazolam group), the other 24 patients were punctured under comfort and contral (control group). Compared the completion rate and cooperation rate of these two group , analysis the changes of patient physiological parameters including heart rate(HR), respiratory rate(RR),systolic blood pressure(SBP), diastolic blood pressure(DBP) and oxygen saturation(SpO2)of Midazolam group before, during and after the LP. Results There were significant difference in the rates of completion and cooperation between the two groups (P〈0. 01). For Midazolam group, no significant difference in the DBP, HR,RR and SpO2 were observed before, during and after the LP(P〈0. 05), except in SBP (P〈0. 05). Conclusions For patients with cognitive impairmen, Midazolam is effectively and safely in lumber puncture.
出处 《卒中与神经疾病》 2014年第3期166-168,共3页 Stroke and Nervous Diseases
关键词 腰椎穿刺 认知功能障碍 镇静 咪达唑仑 Lumber puncture Cognitive impairment Sedation Midazolam
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:1670-1677.
  • 2Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:1004-1017.
  • 3Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota-WK, Goldstein JL, Jacobson BC, Leighton JA, Mallery JS, Faigel DO. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:317-322.
  • 4Faigel DO, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, Johanson JF, Leighton JA, Mallery JS, Peterson KA, Waring JP, Fanelli RD, Wheeler-Harbaugh J. Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:613-617.
  • 5Rex DK. Review article: moderate sedation for endoscopy: sedation regimens for non-anaesthesiologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24:163-171.
  • 6Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, Lopez R, Trolli P, Dumot JA, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol.2005; 100: 2689-2695.
  • 7Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE). Endoscopy 2006; 38:461-469.
  • 8Bell GD, Charlton JE. Colonoscopy--is sedation necessary and is there any role for intravenous propofol? Endoscopy 2000; 32:264-267.
  • 9Rex DK, Khalfan HK. Sedation and the technical performance of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005; 15:661-672.
  • 10Bell GD. Premedication, preparation, and surveillance. Endoscopy 2000; 32:92-100.

共引文献11

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部