期刊文献+

证据标准的新思考

A New Thought of Attestation Criterion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民事诉讼证据的认定应设立标准 ,此在实体法和程序法以及在抑制法官的主观任意性方面皆有重要意义。证据的标准应以实事求是作为总体标准 ,以高度盖然性优势证据标准作为具体标准。在司法实践中 ,法官对总体与具体证据标准的综合运用 ,将有利于其主观能动性的合理发挥 。 The attestation of civil litigation should set up the criterion which has the important meaning on Materical Law, Procedural Law, and restraining judges from their subjectivitive random. The criterion of attestation should include the general criterion that takes the yardstick of the practical and realistic as the attestation and the concrete criterion that takes the criterion of high probability and advantage evidence as the attestation. In the justice practice, the judges' synthetic managing of the general and concrete attestation criterion will be in favor of the reasonable exertion in the course of their subjective activities, and guaranteeing the accuracy and availability to collect evidences.
作者 程宗璋
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《无锡轻工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2001年第1期44-46,93,共4页 Journal of Wuxi University of Light Industry(Social Science Edition)
关键词 证据标准 实事求是 盖然性 优势证据 法律真实 民事诉讼 attestation criterion seek the truth from facts probability advantage evidence
  • 相关文献

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部