期刊文献+

CVDLP与CHOP方案治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ期淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤诱导缓解期疗效比较 被引量:4

Comparing CVDLP with CHOP in Induction Treatment for Patients with Advanced Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨早期强烈诱导缓解方案提高晚期淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤的完全缓解 (complete remission,CR)率。方法: 11例Ⅲ /Ⅳ期初治淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤,诱导缓解期接受 CVDLP方案化疗:环磷酰胺 1000 mg/m2 d1,长春新碱 1.5 mg/m2 d1、 d8、 d15、 d21,阿霉素 40 mg/m2 d1、 d2、 d21,门冬酰胺酶 10 000 U/m2 d15~ 24,强的松 60 mg/m2 d1~ 28,第 15天逐步减量。氨甲喋呤加阿糖胞苷鞘内注射每周一次,共 4次。第 28~ 33天评价疗效。同时回顾性比较 9例初治Ⅲ /Ⅳ期淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤,采用标准 CHOP方案治疗两疗程后的疗效(第 35天)。结果: CVDLP方案组 10例初治病人获得完全缓解 , 1例病人获得部分缓解 ,完全缓解率达 90.9% ;10例病人出现Ⅳ级血液毒性, 1例病人出现Ⅲ级血液毒性( WHO标准)。 CHOP组 3例完全缓解, 5例部分缓解, 1例微效 ,完全缓解率达 33% ;3例病人出现Ⅲ级血液毒性, 6例病人出现Ⅱ级血液毒性。结论:对于晚期淋巴母细胞瘤,诱导缓解期采用 CVDLP方案获得的早期完全缓解率明显高于 CHOP方案,血液毒性也比 CHOP大,但加强支持疗法,此诱导缓解方案安全可行。 Objective: This study was designed to improve complete remission(CR) rate in the patients with advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma by using early extensive induction chemotherapy. Method:A total of 11 cases of untreated lymphoblastic lymphoma in StageⅢ /Ⅳ were received CVDLP regimen, including cytoxan(CTX) 1000 mg/m2 d1, vincristine(VCR) 1.5 mg/m2 d1,d8,d15,d21, Adriamycin(ADR) 40 mg/m2 d1, d2, d21, L- asparaginase(L- ASP) 10000 U/m2 d15~ 24, Prednison 60 mg/m2 d1~ 28, gradually decreased dosage at d15. methotrexate+ Ara- C IT qw× 4. Efficacy were evaluated at d28~ 35. Simultaneously,retrospective analysis for 9 cases of untreated lymphoblastic lymphoma in StageⅢ /Ⅳ treated with 2 cycles of CHOP were made. Efficacy were evaluated at d35. Results: CVDLP group: 10/11 cases of patients achieved CR, and 1/11 case had PR, rate of complete remission was 90.9% ; 10/11 cases had GradeⅣ hematological toxicity,1/11 cases had GradeⅢ hematological toxicity(WHO). CHOP group:3/9 got CR;5/9 got PR;1/9 had MR,rate of complete remission was 33% . 3/9 had GradeⅢ hematology toxicity; 6/9 had GradeⅡ hematological toxicity. Conclusion:CVDLP regimen can induce higher CR rate than CHOP regimen in untreated lymphoblastic lymphoma with StageⅢ /Ⅳ , but hematology toxicity was also higher than CHOP regimen. However this induction regimen is safe and viable with strengthening supportive care.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第4期403-405,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
关键词 晚期淋巴母细胞性淋巴瘤 剂量强度 联合药物治疗 CVDLP方案 CHOP方案 Advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma Dose intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[1]Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig WD, et al. Intensive ALL-type therapy without local radiotherapy provides a 90% event-free survival for children with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma:a BFM group report [J]. Blood, 2000, 95(2):416-421.
  • 2[2]Bouabdallah R, Xerri L, Bardou VJ, et al. Role of induction chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation in adult lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report on 62 patients from a single center [J]. Ann Oncol, 1998, 9(6):619-625.
  • 3[3]Reiter A, Schrappe M, Parwaresch R, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood and adolescence: results of a treatment stratified for biologic subtypes and stage-a report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1995,13(2):359-372.

同被引文献34

  • 1王沁,周红,江志生.T淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤的治疗方案选择[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2004,13(5):303-305. 被引量:5
  • 2孙晓非,姜文奇,刘冬耕,夏忠军,黄慧强,张力,李宇红,周中梅,甄子俊,夏奕,何友兼,管忠震.改良BFM-90方案治疗20例儿童青少年淋巴母细胞型淋巴瘤[J].癌症,2004,23(12):1687-1691. 被引量:5
  • 3潘云,刘卫平,李金范,张文燕,李俸媛,陆晓茜,李丹,李甘地.96例淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤临床病理分析[J].中华血液学杂志,2005,26(4):218-222. 被引量:23
  • 4THOMAS D A, O'BRIEN S, CORTES J, et al. Outcome with the hyper-CVAD regimens in lymphoblastic lymphoma[J]. Blood, 2004,104 : 1624 -- 1630.
  • 5HOELZER D, GOKBUGET N, DIGEL W, et al. Outcome of adult patients with T-lymphoblastic lympho ma treated according to protocols for acute lympho blastic leukemia[J]. Blood, 2002,99:4379-- 4385.
  • 6KANG W,HAHN J S,KIM J S,et al. Nine-year survival of lymphoblastic lymphoma patients[J]. Yonsei Med J,2006,47:466-474.
  • 7CHEN Y C,HO C L,KAO W Y,et al. Adult lymphoblastic lymphoma in Taiwan: an analysis of treatment results of 26 patients[J]. Ann Hematol, 2001,80 : 647 --652.
  • 8SONG K, BARNETT M, GASCOYNE R, et al. Primary therapy for adults with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation results in favorable outcomes [J]. Ann Oncol, 2007,18:535--540.
  • 9SWEETENHAM J W, SANTINI G, QIAN W, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell tran splantation versus conventional-dose consolidatiort/ maintenance therapy as postrernission therapy for adult patients with lymphoblastie lymphoma: results of a randomized trial of the European Group for Blod and Marow Transplantation and the United Kingdom Lymphoma Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001,19: 2927 -- 2936.
  • 10BUTCHER B W,COLLINS R H J R. The graft-versus-lymphoma effect:clinical review and future oppor tunities[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2005, 36 : 1 - 17.

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部