《证类本草》陶序和《名医别录》历史关系之辨析

DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSES ON THE HISTORICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ZHENGLEI BENCAO(HERBOLOGY OF CLASSIFIED SYNDROMES)AND MING YI BIE LU(APPENDANT RECORDS OF FAMOUS PHYSICIANS)

讨论陶弘景撰《本草经集注》是用“苞综诸经”的办法，以诸经中最早的本子《神农本草经》药３６５为主，以吴普、李当之等名医在诸经中增录的药物“名医副品”亦３６５种，编为七卷本《本草经集注》。由于历代本草序，把“名医副品”一词多加改动，从而产生一些误解：一是认为“名医副品”３６５种药来自一本现成《名医别录》书，二是认为《证类本草》“梁陶隐居序”为《名医别录》序。

This author claims that,by using the approach of“inclusion of all canons”,Tao Hongjing in corporated the 365kinds of drugs from the earliest canon“Shen Nong's Herbological Canon”with another 365 kinds of“subordinated drugs from famous physicians”,including Wu Pu and Li Dangzhi etc.to compile his 7-volume“Collected Variorum of Herbological Canon”.Owing to the changes and modifications made on the term“subordinated drugs from famous physicians”by the prefaces of herbological works of successive ages,the misunderstandings that the other 365appendant kinds of drug were derived from an available Ming Yi Bie Lu and that the preface by Tao Yinju of the Liang Dynasty in Zhenglei Bencao was the preface of the book Mingyi Bielu were thus formed.