建议取消不予执行仲裁裁决的司法监督方式

Suggestions on Cancelling the Supervisory Jurisdiction Mode of Refusing to Execute the Arbitral Award

我国仲裁法律制度规定了不予执行和撤销裁决两种司法监督方式 ,它们在功能上基本相同 ,但因在立法技术上对一些具体问题未能合理衔接 ,以致出现逻辑上的矛盾 ,形成诸多缺陷 ,给实践操作带来许多消极后果。故此 ,笔者建议取消不予执行仲裁裁决的司法监督方式 ,以完善我国对仲裁的司法监督体制。

Our country's legal system of arbitration regulates two modes of supervisory jurisdiction:refusing to execute and quashing a ruling.They are much the same in function but also cause contradiction in logic because of the unreasonable link of some concrete problems in legislative technology.Thus many flaws are produced and negative effects are caused in practice operation.According to these,the writer suggests cancelling the supervisory jurisdiction mode of refusing to execute arbitral award to perfect our country's arbitration supervisory jurisdiction system.