期刊文献+

颅内胶质瘤术后不同时期的MRI表现对肿瘤切除程度的评价 被引量:5

MRI Evaluation of Removed Degree of Intracranial Glioma in Different Periods after Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨颅内胶质瘤术后不同时期的MRI增强特点 ,客观地评价脑胶质瘤切除程度。材料与方法 分研究组和对照组 ,研究组为 13例脑胶质瘤 ,对照组包括 15例脑膜瘤和 13例脑内血肿。于手术后早期 ( 3天内 )、中期 ( 10天左右 )、后期 ( 1~ 2个月 )行MRI平扫及增强扫描。分析产生非肿瘤组织强化的原因 ,找出检查的最佳时期。结果 术后 3天内的早期MRI检查 (EPM RI)能正确反映颅内手术情况 ,而中期及后期的检查中有许多干扰因素 ,可出现非肿瘤组织强化 ,影响正确的判断。结论 术后 3天内MRI检查可作为评价胶质瘤切除程度的确切手段。 Objective To assess the removed degree of intracranial glioma by analyzing postoperative MRI features.Materials and Methods Both plain and contrast enhanced MRI scanning was performed postoperatively in 13 patients with glioma (study group) as well as in 15 patients with meningioma and 13 patients with brain hemorrhage (control group) at early (within 3 days), intermediate (around the 10th day) and later stage (in 1~2 months) respectively. The factors causing enhancement of non tumorous tissue were analyzed, and the optimal time for estimating the removed degree of the tumor was deduced.Results MRI within 3 days after surgery could well reflect the intracranial surgical situation, while at inter mediate or later stage many interfering factors, such as non tumorous tissue enhancement, could produce great influence on judgment.Conclusion MRI within 3 days after surgery is a reliable method to assess the removed extent of glioma.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2001年第5期336-339,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 脑胶质瘤 手术切除 磁共振成像 外科手术 Glioma Extent of resection MRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

  • 1谭天秩.临床核医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990.327.
  • 2Zhang M,Radiology,1997年,205卷,471页
  • 3潘中允,临床核医学,1994年,134页
  • 4谭天秩,临床核医学,1993年,327页

共引文献30

同被引文献24

  • 1Forsyth PA, Petrov E, Mahallati H, et al. Prospective study ofpostoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with malignantgliomas[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15(5): 2076-2081.
  • 2Albert FK,Forsting M, Sartor K, et al. Early postoperative magneticresonajice imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objectiveevaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth andprognosis[J]. Neurosurgery, 1994,34(1): 45-60.
  • 3Jeffries, B.F, Kishore PR,Singh KS, et al. Contrast enhancement inthe postoperative brain[J]. Radiology, 1981, 139(2): 409-413.
  • 4Di Costanzo A, Soarabino T,Trojsi Fi,et al. Multiparametric 3T MRapproach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent andmalignancy[J]. Neuroradiology, 2006, 48(9): 622-631.
  • 5Arvinda HR, Kesavadas C, Sarma PS, et al. Glioma grading:sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values ofdiffusion and perfusion imaging[J]. J Neurooncol, 2009, 94(1): 87-96.
  • 6Simon D, Fritzsche KH, Thieke C, et al. Diffusion-weightedimaging-based probabilistic segmentation of high-and low-proliferative areas in high-grade gliomas[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2012,12: 89-99.
  • 7Server A, Kulle B, Gadmar 0B,et al. Measurements of diagnosticexamination performance using quantitative apparent diffusioncoefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperativeevaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011,80(2): 462-470.
  • 8Sanai N,Chang S,Berger MS.Low-grade gliomas in adults[J].J Neurosurg,2011,115(5):948-965.
  • 9Laws ER Jr,Taylor WF,Clifton MB,et al.Neurosurgical management of low-grade astrocytoma of the cerebral hemispheres[J].J Neurosurg,1984,61(4):665-673.
  • 10Englot DJ,Berger MS,Barbaro NM,et al.Predictors of seizure freedom after resection of supratentorial low-grade gliomas.A review[J].J Neurosurg,2011,115(2):240-244.

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部