摘要
对转租的立法规定 ,世界上存在自由主义和限制主义二种模式。我国对转租一贯采限制主义 ,无论是《民法通则》 ,还是原《经济合同法》和《城市房地产管理法》均采此主义。《中华人民共和国合同法》对于转租的规定已趋向宽松 ,但还应尽可能地扩大转租的法律认可范围。转租与租赁权让与的确定与相互关系在立法上也是空白 ,再之 ,不合法转租中是否存在不当得利 ,理论与实践两方面的争议很大。本文拟就上述问题作一粗浅探讨 。
There are two models of liberalism and restrictionism in sublease legislation.Our country adopts restrictionism in General Rules of the Civil Law, the original Economic Contract Law and Urban Real Estate Management Law.Although the restrictions on sublease are relaxed in Contract Law of People's Republic of China,the scope of law regarding sublease should be much more enlarged.The confirmation of sublease and transference of lease right and their relationship remain a blank.What is more, there is much dispute in both theory and practice concerning illegal profits in illegal sublease. This paper studies these issues.
出处
《苏州铁道师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2001年第2期46-50,共5页
Journal of Suzhou Railway Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
