摘要
目的:探讨3种化疗方案(CVP,PVP,MVP)中治疗舌癌费用-效果的最佳方案。方法:运用药物经济学方法对分别采用一种化疗方案的舌癌病人进行费用-效果分析和比较。结果:经分析3种方案的有效率每升高一个百分点分别增加费用79.63元,82.89元和60.85元;生存期每延长1个月所需费用分别为501.12元,573.90元和389.43元。结论:3种方案中MVP最佳,与CVP、PVP相比具有显著性差异(P<0.05)
Objectives: To explore the optimal regimen of cost-effectiveness in treatment of carcinoma of tonque in three chemotherapy regimens. Method; The cost-effectiveness was analysed and compared in patients with carcinoma of tonque receiving respectively one of three chemotherapy regimens by pharmacoeconomis method. Result: By analysis, the effective rate raised 1 % , the cost increased RMB 79.63, 82.89, and 60.85 Yuan, respectively; when the survival peroid lengthened one month, the required cost were 501.12, 573.90, and 389.43 Yuan, respectively. Conclusion: MVP was an optimal regimen in three regimens, there was a significant difference(P<0.05) compared with CVP,PVP.
出处
《中国药师》
CAS
2001年第3期213-215,共3页
China Pharmacist
关键词
舌癌
费用-效果分析
药物经济学
化疗
Carcinoma of tongue
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Pharmacoeconomics
Chemotherapy