期刊文献+

审美现代性批判──法兰克福学派与转型期中国美学的本体论阐释

A criticism of Aesthetic Modernity: An ontologic explanation of Frankfurt School and Chinese Aesthetics in the Transforming Period
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从审美本体论角度看法兰克福学派与转型期中国美学有着密切的现代性关联。从历时的角度看,二者的现代性进程存在着大致相同的理论走向,即从审美感性优先性的推崇走向对审美主义的批判,并重估理性的历史价值。从共时的角度看,法兰克福学派与转型期中国美学都面临着审美现代性的悖论困境。 This paper tries to focus on aesthetic modernity relevance between the Frankfurt School and China in the tranforming period from perspective of aesthetic ontology. From the chronological description of their modernization process we can find there existed a common theory trend. namely from the praise of priority to aesthetic sentiment to the criticism of aestheticism and revaluation of the value of reason. As a conclusion, the paradox of aesthetic modernity is a dilemma which the Frankfurt School and Chinese aesthetics in the transforming period commonly confronted.
作者 陈全黎
出处 《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2001年第1期99-103,共5页 Journal of Hubei Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 审美现代性 法兰克福学派 中国 美学 本体论阐释 审美主义 理性 转型时期 Aesthetic Modernity the Frankfurt School Chinese Aesthetics of Transforming Period Ontologic Explanation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1姚文放.当代审美文化与艺术形式[J].学术月刊,1997,29(4):27-33. 被引量:8
  • 2滕守尧.大众文化不等于审美文化[J].北京社会科学,1997(2):16-20. 被引量:20
  • 3.《马克思恩格斯选集》(第一卷)[M].人民出版社,1972.第25页.
  • 4伊里奇·西格尔.《爱情的故事》,王伟轩,戴铭苏译.花城出版社,1988年,第129页.
  • 5Daniel Bell. The End of Ideology, Canbridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1988.
  • 6罗纳德·梅尔曼.《卡夫卡传》.赵乾龙等译.作家出版社,1988年版,第30、30页.
  • 7T. W. Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper &Brothers, 1950年版.
  • 8Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1973年版,第162页.
  • 9Herbert Marcuse, "On Authority", included in Studies in Critical Philosophy, London, NLB, 1972年版,第49-155页.
  • 10"The Struggle Against Liberalism in the View of the State", included in Negations, Boston, Beacon Press, 1968年版,第3-42页.

共引文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部