摘要
《反三国志演义》对诸葛亮《隆中对》等若干重大决策的指责与否定,是主观的、错误的,原因在于作者自己对《三国演义》与《三国志》的异同失于审察。
In the novel The Anti-Romance of the Three Kingdoms,the blames and negative opinions about Zhuge Liang's serial important decisions are subjective and wrong.The reason for this mistake is that the author himself is confused (lost)in distinguishing the difference between.The Romance of of the Three Kingdoms and History of the Three Kingdoms.
出处
《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》
2001年第3期15-18,共4页
Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition