摘要
目的 :探索司法精神医学鉴定中现实动机作案者与责任能力之间的关系。 方法 :分析78例现实动机作案者的责任能力。 结果 :除 2 4例无精神病外 ,其余 5 4例有各种精神障碍的作案者中有 31例评定为限制责任能力 ,2 3例评定为完全责任能力 ,无 1例能完全免除责任能力。 结论 :动机论适合于司法精神医学鉴定实践 ,现实动机作案者 ,不论其精神状态如何 ,均不能完全免除刑事责任。
Objective:To explore the relations between committing a crime with reality motive and responsibility in psychiatric expert testimony,and evaluate the motive theory. Method:Seventy-eight criminals with reality motive were analyzed with their responsibility. Results:Except for 22 criminals without illness,among the rest 56 criminals with mental disorders,31 were limited responsibi-lity,25 complete responsibility.No one can entirely excuse responsibility. Conclusion:The motive theory is fit for the practice in psychiatric expert testimony.No matter what psychiatric states they are,the criminals with reality motive couldn't completely excuse criminal responsibility.
出处
《临床精神医学杂志》
2001年第3期141-142,共2页
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
关键词
动机
现实
司法精神医学
鉴定
责任能力
Motive
Reality
Psychiatric expert
Testimony
Responsibility