期刊文献+

新旧吸收剂量测定规程中校准因子之间的换算 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
作者 李兵
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2001年第2期130-130,共1页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
  • 相关文献

同被引文献18

  • 1李兵,熊晓斌.放射治疗高能光子束吸收剂量不同测定规程的比较[J].医学研究生学报,2001,14(4):331-333. 被引量:1
  • 2IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 277 (2nd edn in 1997)[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 1987.
  • 3AAPM TG-51. Clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams[J]. Med Phys, 1999, 26(9): 1847-1871.
  • 4IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No.398[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
  • 5AAPM TG-21. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams [J]. Med Phys, 1983, 10 (6): 741-771.
  • 6Burns JE. Conversion of PDD for photon beams from one SSD to another and calculation of TAR, TMR and TPR. In: Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy: 1996, BJR Supplement 25[M]. London: British Institute of Radiology. 1996: 153-157.
  • 7Accuray Inc. Physice essentials guide [M]. Sunnyvale: Accuray Incorporated. 2006: 2-62/2-81.
  • 8Huq MS, Andreo P, Song H. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46 (11):2985-3006.
  • 9Lopez Medina A, Teijeiro A, Salvador F, et al. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jan 7;49(1):17-32.
  • 10Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys. 2002 May;29 (5):857--68.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部