期刊文献+

原发性肝细胞癌RNA,DNA含量测定及临床意义

Analysis of Cellular RNA and DNA Contents of Primary Heptocellular Carcinoma and Its Clinical Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨原发性肝细胞癌RNA ,DNA定量测定的临床意义。方法 应用流式细胞分析技术 ,对 6 4例原发性肝细胞癌 (PHC)RNA ,DNA含量进行定量分析 ,并对病人进行 1~ 5 5年的随访。结果 RNA指标和DNA指标对PHC的临床病理诊断符合率分别为 93 7%和 75 0 % ,RNA指标更敏感 ,双指标联合应用与临床病理诊断符合率为 96 8% ;DNA倍体与年龄、HCV感染密切相关 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,与性别、AFP水平、HBsAg及瘤体大小无关 ;DI随组织学分级的增高而增加 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,RNA和DNA含量与预后密切相关 (P <0 .0 1~ 0 .0 5 )。结论 RNA ,DNA含量可作为PHC诊断及判断预后的理想指标 ,RNA及DNA双指标同时应用优于其中任一单项指标。 Objective To analyze the cellular RNA and DNA contents of primary heptocellular carcinoma and To explore its clinical significance. Method The cellular RNA and DNA contents of 64 patients with primary heptocellular carcinoma (PHC) were analysed by flow cytometry. All patients had been followed-up for one to five and a half years. Result The results showed that the accuracy rates of diagnosis of RNA index (RI) and DNA index (DI) were 93.7% and 75.0% in PHC respectively. Statistically the RI was significantly more sensitive than DI (P<0.05). Analysis with both RI and DI, the accuracy rate was 96.8%. The incidence of aneuploid PHC was higher in patients under 50 years of age and in relation with infection of HCV. However, there was no significant correlation in between DNA ploidy and patient's sex, serum AFP level, HBsAg or tumor size (5 cm as threshold). The DI was correlated with the histologic grading (grade Ⅰ DI=1.25, grade Ⅱ DI=1.40, grade Ⅲ DI=1.51, grade Ⅳ DI=1.68). Conclusion It's considered that flow cytometry DI may be an objective and precise quantitative marker in judging the degree, grade and differentiation of PHC. The RI and DI may be important for indicating the bilogical nature of PHC.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2001年第2期29-32,共4页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 流式细胞术 核糖核酸 脱氧核糖核酸 原发性肝细胞癌 flow cytometry RNA DNA primary heptocellular carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1BARLOGIE B, RABER MN, SCHUMANN J,et al. Flow cytometry in clinical cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 1983, 43:3982.
  • 2SASAKI K, HASHIMOTO T, KAWACHINO K, et al. Intratumoral regiona differences in DNAploidy of gastrointestinal carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1988, 62:2569.
  • 3OKADA S, ISHII H, NOSE H, et al. Intratumoral DNA heterogeneity of smallhepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1995, 75: 444.
  • 4TAYLOR IW. A rapid simple step staining technique for DNA analysis by flowmicrofluorometry[J]. J Histochem cytochem, 1980, 28: 1021.
  • 5POLLACK A. Flow cytometric analysis of RNA content in different cell populationusing pyronin Y and methl green[J]. Cytometry, 1982, 3:28.
  • 6ANDREEFF M, DARZYNKIEWICZ Z, SHARPLESS TK, et al. Discrimination of human leukemiasubtypes by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA and RNA[J]. Blood, 1980, 55:282.
  • 7FUJIMOTO J, OKAMOTO B, YAMANAKA N, et al. Flow cytometric DNA analysis ofhepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer 1991, 67:939.
  • 8BENSAN MC. The application of flow metry to the assessment of tumor cellhetrogencity and the grading of human prostatic cancer: preliminary results[J]. J Urology,1986, 135: 1194.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部